LANGUAGE &
HUMAN MIGRATIONS *
Nyland (2001) has proposed a theory for the
formation of many languages. As this
is a very large topic, it requires an organizational chart.. A simple way to
arrange this still growing number of languages and associated information is
to break them up into six groups: Early languages, Asiatic languages, West
European, East European, North American and Assorted.
----Please CLICK on desired
underlined categories to view:
HYPOTHESES RELATED TO THE THEORY
Hypothesis
1: The Saharan language was the
language of the peoples living in the Sahara during the last Ice Age, who had
created the first true civilization on earth, possibly centered on lake Chad.
As a result of deglaciation, starting about 16,000 bce., resulting in ever
expanding desertification, these tribes were forced to flee for their lives,
creating an exodus culminating between 7,000 and 3,500 bce (see Climate). These
refugees created four main secondary civilizations in Mesopotamia, Egypt, the
Indus Valley and Anatolia.
Hypothesis
2: Portions of the Saharan Language
(an offshoot of the Igbo Language) are
still spoken as Dravidian in India (170 million speakers), as Ainu on the island of Hokkaido
(about 18,000 speakers in 2017) and as Basque in Euskadi, Spain
(800,000 speakers in 2017). Basque is likely the closest resembling the
original language of the exodus.
Hypothesis
3: The people of the exodus from
the Sahara brought with them a matrilineal organized society, the nature
based Goddess religion and the first highly developed language, maintained by
very strong oral traditions.
Hypothesis
4: As a result of several major
advances in a number of fields such as agriculture, metallurgy, domestication
of the horse and camel, astronomy etc. the female-based religion was weakened
and male domination arrived ca 3,000 bce. in Egypt, Mesopotamia and Anatolia,
and about 1,500 bce. in India. The newcomers brought along learned
priesthoods who proceeded to invert all aspects of the old religion, society,
language, legends etc. A new language was invented
for each large area and placed under the control of a king. Examples are, Sumerian and Akadian
in Mesopotamia, Old Egyptian in Egypt, Sanskrit and Hindi
in India, Hebrew in Palestine, Hittite and Luvian in Anatolia etc. All these were
the product of formulaic distortion and scholarly manipulation of the
original Saharan language. The Bible repeats the command to distort the
original language in Genesis 11:7.
Hypothesis
5: These newly created languages
were then introduced to the local populations by taking young boys into
residential schools and forcing the new order onto them, where they were
often brutally treated. The purpose was to destroy the old religion and
language and the traditional oral teaching of wisdom, religion and legends,
replacing it with a patriarchal vision of the world and civilization. They
almost succeeded. The hidden sentences in the invented words can be decoded) with the use of the
Basque dictionary and a simple formula (see Saharan
Language).
Theory:
Nyland (2001) proposed that all highly developed
languages on earth (except possibly Chinese) might have been developed from
the original Saharan language, which in itself was also scholarly
enhanced from the Neolithic substratum. There exists no
"family" of Indo-European or Semitic languages. There are no
Indo-European or proto-Indo-European languages. Scholars invented all these unstable
languages. Only Saharan has remained relatively unchanged and is now spoken as Basque.
[Please also see Evolution of Human Languages]
|