Rapid evolution of a sexual signal in the field cricket, Teleogryllus
oceanicus
|
The dulcet tones of
cricket song that we find so relaxing on warm evenings are
actually the advertisement calls of sexually
receptive males. A nasty threat looms
over Teleogryllus oceanicus populations
in Hawaii, however. A villain of the blackest dye, the parasitoid
fly Ormia ochracea, emerges at night to prey on hapless male
crickets. Female flies home in on male cricket song, and squirt
live larvae onto their hosts. Larvae then burrow through the
cuticle and feast on various internal cricket structures. After a
week or so, the engorged, pulsing maggots burst out of their host, leaving a hollow cricket husk behind. Clearly, this is not
a desirable situation to be in if you are a male cricket. Our
research team has recently made an astonishing discovery
on the Hawaiian island of Kauai. In 2003, an
e erie
silence had descended on the population. Had
all the males
ceased calling? Had the population gone extinct? After some
investigation, we discovered that a dramatic morphological mutation had
arisen in some males, causing the loss of sound-producing structures on their wings (larger image). These flatwing males are protected from
predation by acoustically orienting parasitoids. The proportion of flatwing males on Kauai has
increased from zero to nearly 90 percent in fewer than 30 generations,
representing one of the fastest evolutionary shifts documented in a
wild population. We are currently investigating the extent to
which pre-existing behaviors facilitated the emergence and spread of
this mutation, providing new and exciting insights into the
interactions between behavior
and evolutionary change.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7eece/7eece0d0c7fd147ae53a308e431d826b68550598" alt="cover"
Our work on this system now features in the most recent edition of
"Principles of Animal Behavior" by LA Dugatkin. For further
reading, check out:
- Bailey, N.W. and Zuk, M. (2008) Acoustic experience
shapes female mate choice in field crickets. Proceedings of the Royal
Society of London, B 275: 2645-2650.
- Bailey, N.W., McNabb, J.R. and Zuk, M. (2008) Pre-existing
behavior facilitated the loss of a sexual signal in the field cricket Teleogryllus
oceanicus. Behavioral Ecology 19: 202-207.
- Tinghitella, R.M. (2008) Rapid evolutionary change in a
sexual signal: genetic control of the mutation 'flatwing' that renders
male field crickets (Teleogryllus oceanicus) mute. Heredity
100: 261-267.
- Zuk, M., Rotenberry, J.T., and Tinghitella, R.M. (2006).
Silent night: Adaptive disappearance of a sexual signal in a
parasitized population of field crickets. Biology Letters 2: 521-524.
|
Evolution
of Sex Differences in Disease Susceptibility
|
In many animal species, females have more
robust immunity and are less likely to harbor parasites than males.
Why is that? Comparative and theoretical work from current and
former lab members has examined the evolutionary causes of sex-biased
parasitism and immune responses, placing these traits in the context of
sexual selection. Check out:
- Stoehr,
A.M. and Kokko, H. (2007) Sexual dimorphism in immunocompetence: what
does life-history theory predict? Behavioral Ecology 17:751-756.
- McKean, K. and
M. Zuk. (1995) The evolution of signaling in immunology and behavior.
Naturwissenschaften 82:509-516.
- Zuk, M. (1990) Reproductive strategies and
sex differences in disease susceptibility: an evolutionary viewpoint.
Parasitology Today 6:231-233.
|
Sex and Gender in Humans and
Animals
|
Those of
us who study sexual behavior in animals have noticed that people like
to apply what we learn to their own behavior. We often get people
asking questions like, "Is monogamy natural?" or "Does homosexuality
exist in non-humans?" Marlene Zuk and others in the lab enjoy
interacting with other scientists as well as the general public in
discussions of these and related issues, and if you are interested, you can check out some of the following:
- Zuk, M. (2006) Family values in black and white. Nature
439:917.
- Zuk, M. (2004) Birds do it, bonobos do it (opinion). Los
Angeles Times, March 7, M3.
- Zuk, M. (2004) Make way for genes and ducklings. Chronicle
of Higher Education, January 9, 2004 B13-B14.
- Zuk, M. (2003) Why not save jellyfish as well as
whales? Chronicle of Higher Education, March 21, 2003 B13-B14.
- Zuk, M. (2002) Sexual Selections: what we can and can't
learn about sex from animals. University of California Press, Berkeley.
- Zuk, M. (2002) Birds do it (opinion article). Los Angeles
Times, June 2, 2002, M6.
- Zuk, M. (2002) A straw man on a dead horse: Studying
adaptation then and now. Commentary on Andrews et al.: Adaptationism:
How To Carry Out an Exaptationist Program. (invited contribution)
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25: 533-534.
- Zuk, M. (2002) Can nature be declawed? Natural History,
10/02: 38-41.
- Zuk, M. (1997) Darwinian medicine dawning in a feminist
light. Pp. 417-430 in: Feminism and evolutionary biology: boundaries,
intersections, and frontiers (P.A. Gowaty, ed.). Chapman and Hall, New
York.
- Zuk, M. (1993) Feminism and the study of animal behavior.
BioScience 43:774-778.
|