FILE: <bc-19.htm> ` Pooled References
GENERAL INDEX [Navigate
to MAIN MENU ]
FACULTATIVE
SEX REGULATION
In Arthropods
(Contacts)
---- Please CLICK on underlined categories for detail[ to search for Subject Matter, depress
Ctrl/F ]:
Spermatheca
and Spermathecal Gland
Types of
Spermathecae in Hymenoptera
References [Please
refer also to Selected Reviews & Detailed Research ]
History Biparental
Hymenoptera are well known for their ability to regulate the sex ratio of
their offspring, which is
dependent on their haplo-diploid kind of reproduction. In the process, the
ovipositing female responds by instinct to environmental stimuli. Stimuli
such as host density, host size, temperature, humidity, parasitoid density,
etc., interact on the instincts of the female to cause her to lay fertilized
or unfertilized eggs. However, the female's physiological condition can
affect the way she responds to various stimuli. When such factors as lack of
mating, female age and nutrition, infection with certain microorganisms,
genetic phenomena, etc. are involved and sex regulation is not possible. Spermatheca
and Spermathecal Gland The spermatheca and spermathecal gland
are organs that enable sex regulation to take place. Sperm stored in the
hymenopteran spermatheca are quiescent except when the females are in contact
with oviposition sites which stimulates the spermathecal gland (Flanders
1939). Flanders demonstrated sperm quiescence in the wasp Tiphia, which had been
suspected by Lillie (1919, p. 132). To account for this quiescence, Flanders
accepted as valid the conclusions of Lillie (1919) and other contemporaries
that sperm when in concentrated suspensions retain their vitality longer than
in more dilute suspensions because they rapidly produce a paralyzing
concentration of CO2. Lillie (1919) noted that insect sperm when
stored in the spermatheca retain their vitality for many years. The few
sperms at the opening of the spermatheca must be subjected to some activating
agent before the egg can be fertilized. The source of such an agent appears
to be the spermathecal gland, which presumably secretes a fluid that is
slightly alkaline (Flanders 1946). In the honeybee, Lensky & Schindler
(1967) found that the spermathecal gland fluid and contents of the
spermatheca ranged from neutral to pH 9; and the activation of sperm was accomplished
by dilution in pH 4.5 to 9.0. This refutes Lillie's hypothesis of CO2
anesthetization. The capacity
of the spermathecal gland to keep pace with the rate of egg deposition is
probably an important factor in determining the sex ratio (Flanders 1947). Types of Spermathecae
in Hymenoptera.--Many hypotheses antedated Flanders (1939) to explain the
apparent ability of the mated arrhenotokous female to control the action of
the spermatheca. Phillips (1903) made some remarks about facultative
fertilization, and Schrader (1920) stated that the female fertilizes its eggs
in response to a stimulus, while studying the white fly Trialeurodes vaporariorum
(Westwood). Flanders believed that the spermathecal gland may be stimulated
by contact of the antennae, legs, or ovipositor with the medium on which the
eggs are to be deposited, with variations in the condition of this medium
causing variable amounts of stimulation. It is probable that the spermatheca
responds only to the stimuli of certain intensities, reacting to its fullest
extent or not at all. In some biparental species the spermatheca, if
functional, may be stimulated only by the passage of an egg. In such cases
every deposited egg would be fertilized as long as the spermatheca contained viable
sperm. It is interesting that in some females that reproduce by thelytoky,
the spermatheca appears capable of functioning. Sometimes mating may even
occur in such species [e.g., Encyrtus
spp., Muscidifurax uniraptor Kogan & Legner, Aphytis mytilaspidis (LeBaron) (Legner 1988a, Rossler &
DeBach 1972a)]. Significant behavioral and sex ratio changes accompany mating
of thelytokous females, however (Legner 1988b). A peculiar
situation is known to exist with some thelytokous Coleoptera [e.g., the
white-fringed beetle, Graphognathus
leucoloma (Boheman)] where
copulation with a male of a different species is required before any of the
thelytokous eggs can be viable. Three types
of spermathecae have been described in Hymenoptera (Flanders 1939, 1956). Type I is found in the honeybee, and Tiphia. There is a wide sperm duct which can be bent into
a valve at its juncture with the capsule. A number of sperm can be discharged
simultaneously, and glandular fluids activate and transport sperm, which
serves to regulate the number of sperm released on each egg as it passes
along the oviduct. The spermathecal gland empties into the sperm capsule
instead of the sperm duct as in other species.
Type II spermatheca is
found in ichneumonids and braconids. The spermathecal gland empties into the
lumen of the sperm duct. The short exit passage from the capsule to the sperm
duct is so narrow that only a single sperm can move in or out at one time.
The gland is very voluminous in ichneumonids, while braconids have a smaller
gland but it is accompanied by a contractile reservoir.
Type III spermatheca
occurs in chalcidoids. The gland is very small, and glandular secretions
serve only for sperm activation. The sperm in these species are
extraordinarily long. Considerations
in Sex Regulation In females
with activated sperm, the sequence of fertilized and unfertilized eggs may be
determined in part by the rate of oviposition. The number of sperms present
in the spermatheca can also influence sex ratio as well as previous
oviposition experience. Marchal (1898) suggested that the power of
discrimination on the part of the female is effected through the differential
stimulation of the spermatheca, the latter being activated only when the
female honeybee oviposits in large cells. Marchal also was the first to
suggest that a spermatheca could become fatigued. Coccophagus ochraceus
Howard parasitizing Saissetia
spp. stands on top of the host when her spermathecal gland is turgid and
injects a fertilized egg internally. When the gland is depleted she stands at
the side of the host and deposits a male egg underneath the host in a dry
environment. In
endoparasitic braconids of the genera Apanteles
and Opius, the females are
characterized by small uterine-stored eggs that can be deposited very
rapidly. Since these females possess Bracon-type
spermathecae, the spermathecal gland of gregarious species cannot keep pace
with the egg deposition. The proportion of eggs that thus escape
fertilization is so great in Apanteles
and Opius (Biosteres) that males usually
predominate even at low densities under field conditions. Spalangia species deposit more
fertilized eggs when oviposition occurs at high than at low host densities
(Legner 1967a,
1967b), a trend that
was also observed in Goniozus
legneri Gordh (Legner &
Warkentin 1988 ). However, the rate of oviposition here is not rapid in a way
that some eggs might escape fertilization. External stimuli (namely variable host
densities) are thought to influence the spermathecal gland directly. This
response of fertilizing more eggs at high host densities was hypothesized by
Flanders (1939) using evidence from field data, where sex ratios tend to
favor females at increasing host field densities. Exercise 19.1--How do sperm stored in the spermatheca become
activated? Exercise 19.2--Describe the various types of spermathecae in
Hymenoptera. Exercise 19.3--How does rate of oviposition influence the sex ratio? Exercise 19.4--How does host density influence the sex ratio? Exercise 19.5--Explain how the progeny increase in response to host
density with parasitoids of synanthropic flies, affects the functional and
numerical responses in their populations. Exercise 19.6--Using examples of Spalangia
cameroni, S. endius, Muscidifurax
and Nasonia, discuss all the
subtle responses of these species to fluctuating host densities. Explain how
any or all of such responses might be measured in nature. REFERENCES: [Additional references may be found at
MELVYL Library ] Bellows,
T. S., Jr. & T. W. Fisher, (eds) 1999. Handbook of Biological Control:
Principles and Applications. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. 1046 p. Flanders, S. E. 1939. Environmental
control of sex in hymenopterous insects. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 32: 11-26. Flanders, S. E. 1943. The
role of mating in the reproduction of parasitic Hymenoptera. J. Econ. Ent. 36: 802-03. Flanders, S. E. 1946a. The
mechanism of sex control of the honey bee. J. Econ. Ent. 39: 379. Flanders, S. E. 1946b. Control
of sex and sex-limited polymorphism in the Hymenoptera. Quart. Rev. Biol. 21:
135-43. Flanders, S. E. 1947. Elements
of host discovery exemplified by parasitic Hymenoptera. Ecology 28: 299-309. Flanders,
S. E. 1956. The mechanisms of sex ratio regulation in the parasitic
Hymenoptera. Insectes Sociaux 3: 325-34. Flanders,
S. E. 1969. Herbert D. Smith's observation on citrus blackfly parasites in
India and Mexico and the correlated circumstances. Canad. Ent. 101: 467-80. 45. Legner, E. F. 1967a. Two exotic
strains of Spalangia drosophilae merit consideration in
biological control of Hippelates collusor (Diptera: Chloropidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 60(2): 458-462. 46. Legner, E. F. 1967b. Behavior changes
the reproduction of Spalangia cameroni, S. endius, Muscidifurax raptor, and Nasonia vitripennis (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) at increasing
fly host densities. Ann. Entomol.
Soc. Amer. 60(4): 819-826. 237. Legner, E. F. 1988a. Muscidifurax raptorellus (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) females exhibit
postmating oviposition behavior typical of the male genome. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 81(3): 522-527. 241. Legner, E. F. 1988. Studies of four
thelytokous Puerto Rican isolates of Muscidifurax
uniraptorEntomophaga 33(3); 269-280. 240. Legner, E. F. & R. W. Warkentin. 1988. Parasitization of Goniozus legneri
(Hymenoptera: Bethylidae) at increasing parasite and host Amyelois transitella (Lepidoptera: Phycitidae) densities. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 81(5): 774-776. Lensky, Y. & H. Schindler. 1967.
Motility and reversible inactivation of honeybee spermatozoa in vivo and in
vitro. Ann.
del Abeille 10(1): 5-16. Lillie, F. R. 19l9. Problems
of fertilization. Univ. of Chicago Sci. Series. 278 p. Marchal,
P. 1898. Le cycle evolutif de l' Encyrtus
fusicollis. Bull. Soc. Ent.
de France: 109-11. Marchal,
P. 1904. Recherches sur la biologie et le developpement des hymenopteres
parasites. I.
La Polyembryonie specifique ou germinogonie. Arch. de Zool. Exp. et Gen. 2:
257-335. Marchal, P. 1936. Recherches sur la
biologie et le developpement des Hymenopteres parasites: Les Trichogrammes. Ann.
Epiphyties, Paris 2: 447-550. Phillips,
E. F. 1903. A review of parthenogenesis. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 42: 275-345. Rössler, Y. & P. DeBach. 1972a.
The biosystematic relations between a thelytokous and an arrhenotokous form
of Aphytis mytilaspidis (LeBaron)
[Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae]. I. The reproductive relations. Entomophaga 17: 391-423. Rössler, Y. & P. DeBach. 1972b.
The biosystematic relations between a thelytokous and an arrhenotokous form
of Aphytis mytilaspidis (LeBaron)
[Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae]. 2. Comparative biological and morphological
studies. Entomophaga
17: 425-35. Rössler, Y. & P. DeBach. 1973.
Genetic variability in a thelytokous form of Aphytis mytilaspidis
(LeBaron) [Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae]. Hilgardia 42(5): 149-76. Schrader, F. 1920. Sex
determination in the white fly (Trialeurodes
vaporariorum). J. Morph. 34:
267-98. |