Substrate Flexibility and the Copernican Principle of Consciousness
Jeremy Pober and Eric Schwitzgebelin draft
We present a novel argument for the substrate flexibility of consciousness -- that is, for the idea that conscious experiences can arise in a variety of different types of physical media, not just in biological animals as they currently exist on Earth. Some recent critiques of standard arguments for the substrate flexibility of consciousness (e.g., Cao 2022; Block 2025; Seth forthcoming) have emphasized that humanlike consciousness might require our specific biological substrate. However, such critiques are too narrowly focused to address the issue of consciousness in entities whose experience may be very different from ours, for example alien life forms or future AI systems designed along unfamiliar lines. Given that it's likely that functionally complex, behaviorally sophisticated entities have arisen or will arise many times in the observable universe, in diverse substrates, we argue that it would be a violation of a principle of Copernican mediocrity to hold that among these diverse entities, only we, or only we and a small proportion of others who share our substrate, are conscious.
By following any of the links below, you are requesting a copy for personal use only, in accord with "fair use" laws.
Click here to view as a PDF file: Substrate Flexibility and the Copernican Principle of Consciousness (pdf, May 26, 2026).
Click here to view as an html file: Substrate Flexibility and the Copernican Principle of Consciousness (html, May 26, 2026).
Or email eschwitz at domain: ucr.edu for a copy of this paper.