The Full Rights Dilemma for A.I. Systems of Debatable PersonhoodEric Schwitzgebel
Robonomics, 4, article 32
An Artificially Intelligent system (an AI) has debatable personhood if it’s epistemically possible either that the AI is a person or that it falls far short of personhood. Debatable personhood is a likely outcome of AI development and might arise soon. Debatable AI personhood throws us into a catastrophic moral dilemma: Either treat the systems as moral persons and risk sacrificing real human interests for the sake of entities without interests worth the sacrifice, or don’t treat the systems as moral persons and risk perpetrating grievous moral wrongs against them. The moral issues become even more perplexing if we consider cases of possibly conscious AI that are subhuman, superhuman, or highly divergent from us in their morally relevant properties.
By following any of the links below, you are requesting a copy for personal use only, in accord with "fair use" laws.
Click here to view the final manuscript version as a PDF file: The Full Rights Dilemma for A.I. Systems of Debatable Personhood (pdf, January 20, 2023).
Click here to view the final manuscript version as an html file: The Full Rights Dilemma for A.I. Systems of Debatable Personhood (html, January 20, 2023).
Or email eschwitz at domain: ucr.edu for a copy of this paper.
Return to Eric Schwitzgebel's homepage.