File:  tomniczaklist.htm `                                                                                                                                                                          <American Archeology>                          <Navigate to Main Menu>                    <Home>  

 

 

                                                                                                                ANCIENT SCRIPTS IN MINNESOTA

 

                                                                               Figure List & Descriptions

 

 

     Please CLICK on photos to enlarge:

 

Fig. 1

       "Saddle Axe” found with a metal detector by fellow researcher “TINA HERZOG” at the base of an very large oak tree  Notice the upper left side of the blade has seen trauma most likely due to chopping ice, accessing food and water.  The “Saddle Axe”, handy and well balanced was utilized by lumber scouts marking tree harvesting boundaries while remaining on horseback.

 

       1842 Field survey notebook.  Chains and poles, (similar to 10 yard chains in football) were used as a measurement tool moved in succession North, South, East and West. Laying a grid work of “corner stones” for Timber and acreage assessment as well as Federal Agricultural allocation. (Land Grants)

 

Fig. 3

       This “journal” entry describes a trail used as a trade route, put in place in an ancient time and utilized by many cultures.” A trail leading from Mille Lacs to Little Rock bears South West”. Being it only a two day travel from Little Rock to Mille Lacs,  Critical thinking  challenges one to Reverse that bearing, resuming trial on North east side of lake and continue that heading  on a two day journey to Lake Superior.  Clues left behind by these Ancient explorers are documented in books such as...“The story of Morrison county, Their people, industries and institutions” by Clara Fuller (1915)  In Chapter two the book references “peculiar earthworks” with prehistoric undertones. https://archive.org/details/historyofmorriso02full

 

Fig. 4

       …One “Cairn” resembled a “turtle” shape.  The Piles of rocks making up the “cairns” consisted of all sizes.  Some stones 30” in diameter, as well as 3”in diameter.  3” stones do not represent “picker” rocks, and would not have been from field clearing.  Most Sites are located on ridge tops making logistics futile for agricultural purposes.

 

Fig. 5

       G.P.S overlay of the area in which inscriptions have been located.  Most of the sites are located at the highest elevation overlooking a large wetland (Prehistoric shallow lake). The area is very rich in Iron Ore as well as other precious metals.  Earlier this spring   “Bog Iron” was retrieved by metal detection, with logistics favoring unabated wind, the “cairns” might have been a series of “Iron Furnaces”.  This theory would possibly explain burnt wood recovered from excavation.

 

Fig. 6

       75% of this boulder top has been modified to provide a sturdy and level work platform.  Was the intended use for food preparation? I.E grinding or meat carving.  This boulder stands at a central point of the “communal area”, within proximity of two rock lined holes. (Fire pits?)

 

Fig. 7a

      The overall shape of this “Pictograph” seems to have been influenced by a region that practices “Cranial Binding”, such as the sculpture of “Nefertiti” The Egyptian Queen. Her reign ended in the year 1336 B.C    Or a culture with physical features like this Skull found in Nazca, Peru

 

 

 

Fig. 7b

d

      The overall shape of this “Pictograph” seems to have been influenced by a region that practices “Cranial Binding”, such as the sculpture of “Nefertiti” The Egyptian Queen. Her reign ended in the year 1336 B.C    Or a culture with physical features like this Skull found in Nazca, Peru

 

Fig. 8a

       A rare earth magnet is equally attracted throughout the entire rock.  Iron and nickel were registered on detection equipment; however other area samples that have been sent to a lab for a metals scan have produced a plethora of metallic resources.

 

 

Fig. 8b

Area samples that have been sent to a lab for a metals scan have produced a plethora of metallic resources.

 

Fig. 9

       The width and shape of the “tool” used to form and incise is very evident, a proto “chisel”, two short sides and one main blade.  At least three downward cuts were made to “score” this rock; it was further incised down the break in an “extension” of the character topside.   The downward cuts had come after the inscription; the long lateral line was the last stroke, based on medium drifting onto earlier lateral strokes.  Did the downward cuts separate an adjoining piece?

 

Fig. 10

       Upon initial viewing most experts in their fields (Archeologists and professors worldwide) agree that these “Artifacts” were indeed inscribed by a human.  The text resembles “Roman”, In Roman numerals an X in front of L = 10 less than 50 equates to 40, (“Ten men dead, red with blood”, as inscribed on the Kensington Runestone?)  It also bears a strong resemblance to an “Ansus”, which is part of the Viking “Futark” alphabet.  Researchers have possibly identified the text as “Ogam” a form of stick writing originating in early Africa around the river Nile.  This form of written expression will later will provide a “keystone” in developing Europe’s more “modern” forms of text.

 

Fig. 11

         “A Deer hunting story”.   Throughout history man has always found a way to memorialize a special Hunt, earlier cultures expressed themselves with Cave pictures and petroglyphs.  Fast forward to today, hunters record their harvest by taking pictures, and mounting of the antlers.  This “picture” depicts a bow with Arrow “knocked”, Action represented by second arrow in flight.  Target is a four legged animal (deer?)

 

Fig. 12

       Years of weathering conceals ancient work.  With varying angles of light more detail was exposed.

 

Fig. 13

       The animals “torso” was etched in a different manner then the “legs”, which were “chiseled.”

 

Fig. 14

       Clearly the “Bow” was added after the “Arrow”. The last stroke will leave “wakes” on preexisting characters.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fig. 15

       This baseball sized rock is wrapped with a fossilized “fibrous” substance (twine?)   Under greater magnification, one can observe slight “grooves” worn into rock under “twine” placement.

 

Fig. 16

       Residue embedded in text, could yield information as to the technology available at that time. Inductive coupled plasma mass spectrometer testing would differentiate between which “metal alloy” was used to penetrate the Iron rich artifact.

 

Fig. 17

       A “cairn” with forest debris cleared away.  “Shovel” tests concluded base of pile and area underneath are “one”.  The area below ground is as dense with rocks and boulders as the pile on the surface. Could this be due to years of detritus build up around the base? 

 

Fig. 18

       The “twine” is looped, as you would have done if you had one length.  The Twine would be guided around itself and pulled from opposite angles.  Purpose of this could be for weighting down hanging hides, or depth sounding.

 

 

Fig. 19

       A “Heart shaped” stone.  Notice overlapping of rocks.

 

Fig. 20

       Missing section of “twine”, proving it is not any type of “mineral vein.”

 

Fig. 21

       Rocks placed in succession to a massive Quartz boulder 90 percent buried.

 

Fig. 22

       These types of “Ancient Trails” started out as explorers footprints, followers left paths, that turned into a trail system that led many early European cultures to “communal “areas of Commerce as well as convenient trade routes to major waterways.

 

Fig. 23-1

      L.I.D.A.R radar technology eliminates vegetation, while highlighting undulations as subtle as a 24 inch rise in terrain. This process exposes shapes and angles that are unnatural. This represents the same area as the G.P.S overlay of the site.

 

Fig. 23-2

 

Fig. 23-3

  .  The United States Dept. of Interior refers to common areas on historic Portage routes as “Portage Terminals”.  They served as highly developed rest and refitting stations, some developed into trading posts.  This “Portage Terminal” shows signs of squared foundations as well as a large rectangular rise in the terrain, which has been documented by the Iowa office of state archeology researching a culture referred to as ”The Great Oasis” (900-1200 A.D) to be an earth covered lodge collapsed to form a large rectangular mound (Tumuli?)   Cache sites were common, with pits or rock cairns being indicative of storage sites used to secure items for future use. (Food, warm clothes, weapons)

 

Fig. 24-1

 Artifact recovered from site 11

What is the Artifact locked in the substrate? (Sabretooth, Allosaurus tooth?) What is the Substrate? (Possibly Coprolite?) When was the attempted ancient “excavation” of the subject, which is evident by “Tool Marks” surrounding the Artifact?   Was it intended to look line an elephant?  The earth works in the Ohio valley were comparatively recent and created later then the first sights in Iowa, Minnesota and Wisconsin. As indicated by the total absence of signs of the Mastodon.  The earlier sites seem to have some acquaintance with the  "melephant, confirmed by the worship of the “mammoth” expressed in pictographs.  (The Aborigines of Minnesota; Winchell 1911) 

 

 

Fig. 24-2

Unidentified Lower bone inclusion.  Also highlighting long horizontal “tooling” mark

 

Fig. 24-3

Crude attempts with ancient tools to extrapolate the tooth from the substrate resulted in damaging the artifact.

 

Fig. 25-1

Modern travel corridors (roads) were often constructed utilizing existing trails or “Tote” roads, generally followed waterways.  These waterways today are mere creeks, suppling drainage for storm runoff.

 

Fig. 25-2

Utilizing L.I.D.A.R technology we see Ancient river tributaries leading to the Mississippi and Red River valley, perfect for shallow bottom vessels such as a Viking Ship.  This would explain Mooring holes on dry land, but also why the “Kensington” rune stone references its resting place as an “Island” when in fact it is not.

 

Fig. 26

Unidentified possible bone fragment (Vertebrae) side A

 

Fig. 27

Possible animal bone fragment (vertebrae) side B

 

Fig. 28

PETAGA POINT EXCAVATION

 

See pdf file:  Petaga Point Archeology

 

 

 

 

Fig.

BLANK