Return to Publications List                                                                                        
                  ◄ Next
Page►
 
| 51             In conclusion, it may be stated that
  dieldrin and aldrin show a wider separation in their degree of effectiveness
  with respect to one another than do chlordane and heptachlor.  It may be further noted that dieldrin is
  the most widely separated from all the others, both from the standpoint of
  the initial inherent killing power and longer residual life.             A comparison of the effects of the
  light, medium and heavy concentrations of any one chemical reveals that the
  heavy dosage was, more rapid in effecting the highest kill.  In contrast to this marked superiority of
  the heavy dosage, comparisons of the medium and light concentrations with one
  another show less difference in performance with equivalent results in the
  long run.  The fact that the lighter
  dosages paralleled each other to a high degree and in most cases terminated
  by giving approximately the same per cent of kill, would suggest that they
  are equal in effectiveness in the end.             The number of recoveries recorded
  for individuals, that had at one time shown severe effects of the chemicals,
  was greater in the second and third experiments where later life stages of
  the insects were used and
  where the environmental conditions were most favorable for keeping them
  active.  On the other hand, there
  seemed to be no consistent difference in the total numbers which recovered in
  any given experiment from any specific
  chemical.   It was shown that aldrin allowed
  the fewest
  recoveries, and was followed by chlordane and dieldrin showing equal effects,
  and heptachlor.             In the timed exposure experiment,
  the data indicate that there is a relationship between the effects of certain
  chemicals and the length of time that earwigs are exposed to them.  The trend was for those   |