[Note:  All Basque words are in Italics and Bold-faced Green]
 
|     ODYSSEUS’
  TRAVELS *  A review derived from the following:   Nyland, Edo.  2001.  Linguistic Archaeology: AnIntroduction. Trafford Publ., Victoria, B.C., Canada. ISBN 1-55212-668-4. 541 p.   ----Please CLICK on underlined categories for detail [to search for Subject Matter, depress
  Ctrl/F ]:   
     THE SAHARA EXODUS             To trace the origin
  of the violent fighting of around 1,200 bce. (See Sea Peoples), it is best to
  look at the early development of the people and the two religions, which were
  at odds, starting with the time that the Sahara had turned into a desert and
  became unlivable (see Climate).  The height of
  glaciation’s came about 16,000 bce. At that time, the world's oceans had been
  lowered over 100 meters because much of the earth’s water was stored in
  glaciers on the continents. At first, the melting of the huge continental
  glaciers was slow. However, by 10,000 bce., the retreat of the glaciers from
  the mountain ranges of Europe had created significant changes in continental
  air circulation, which caused the Sahara to change from a lush grazing area
  into an ever-expanding desert. The many tribes which had lived there for
  millennia, had to flee the encroaching desert, taking their cattle with them.
  Migration did not take place haphazardly.. When the decision had been made to
  move, an entire tribe migrated together and embarked for transportation. They
  reunited at their landing site in Europe before moving on to their new
  region. No one was left behind, except for the Sea Peoples tribes themselves
  who had to maintain the contact between their original homeland and the
  colonies established by them. This north African heritage is still very
  noticeable in Ireland, as described by Bob
  Quinn in his book "The Atlantean,
  Ireland's North African Heritage".              Most of the
  migrating tribes had fled the drought by going north to Europe, a name from
  Basque eur-opa, euri (rain) opa (longing for) means "Longing for rain" (Nyland 2001)). The two major groups of Sea
  Peoples of North Africa, the Berbers from Morocco and Algiers, and the Shardana from Cyrenaica and
  the Black Sea, ferried these migrating tribes across the Mediterranean north
  to Europe and the Balkan via the Black Sea. The Atlantic coast of Europe had
  been colonized earlier by the dark-haired Rh-negative Berber tribes from
  Morocco, who had established population centers in the Bay of Biscay, western
  Ireland, the Hebrides of Scotland, on many of the Norwegian islands, the
  southern tip of Sweden and as far north as Arctic Norway.              These sea
  migrants brought along the three pillars of their civilization: 1) absolute
  faith in re-incarnation and their Great Goddess, 2) a highly disciplined
  system of oral education and 3) their ancient and well-developed Saharan
  language.  Edo Nyland has referred to
  their belief as a way of life, because there was no separation between the
  secular and the faith. A religion, by definition, is based on revelation such
  as found in Christianity, Judaism and Islam, which the Goddess' way of life
  was not. Studies of contemporary primitive societies have provided insights
  into the social structure of this population.  It was based on the tribal, or extended family, system. The
  family unit as we know it today with father, mother and children, did not
  exist.  The unit was the tribe and
  children born into the tribe were the responsibility of every adult. It took
  the whole community to raise a child. This was a matrilineal organized
  society and the paternity of a child, or its birth date for that matter, was
  not important. The tribal council controlled the land surrounding the
  village, which was administered democratically by a council of elders headed
  by the Amona, the
  head of the matrilineal organized tribe. It lacked the centralized and
  autocratic structure of the later patriarchy where one man dominated. The
  title Amona was abbreviated to Mona
  and ‘”M”, followed by the name of the tribe such as in M'Uhin, now
  spelled M'Ewen or McEwen (uhin means waves: the tribe of the navigators. Even today the family
  names in Morocco are often spelled with M'.   There are still families in
  Scotland and Ireland that refused to accept the patriarchal Mac and have
  retained the M', such as in M'Gonigle.               The first traces
  of dissent in the age-old Goddess civilization were noted around 4,000
  bce.according to archaeologist Marija Gimbutas, somewhere in Anatolia or
  Southern Russia. It happened at about the same time as the invention of
  metalworking, the domestication of horse and camel, large scale agriculture
  and the first population pressures. It is likely that all these conditions
  contributed to the upcoming breakdown. The Goddess civilization had been
  developed among the herding and fishing tribes in which the men were away
  from home for very long periods.  This
  left the women in charge of the home front. As long as the men's work was
  away from home and contact was maintained with the religious center, the
  Goddess religion was unchallenged .             After exodus
  from the Sahara, contact between the tribes was maintained by boat and the
  culture was centrally nurtured from Malta. The problems arose with those
  tribes that had no sailing and navigation traditions and were located in
  regions far away from the sea.  They
  had no regular contact with the center on Malta. Those who had settled in the
  Fertile Crescent of Mesopotamia, in Anatolia and in southern Russia,
  developed large-scale agriculture that kept the men near to home, and they
  gradually assumed a more prominent role in the tribe. Those agricultural
  areas appear to have been the first places where young men refused to
  volunteer for sacrifice, after participation in the Sacred Marriage. They had
  tasted the exaltation of temporary kingship wearing the purple robe that
  denoted semi-deity status. In prosperous and happy times, there had been no
  need for a homegrown human sacrifice. 
  Therefore, it began to be play-acted or a prisoner was substituted.
  This prolonged a young prince's exalted position as the bridge between the
  deity and the people and he became accustomed to a very pleasing existence.
  When difficult times arose and a sacrifice became necessary, why should he be
  eager to give all that up in exchange for hypothetical re-incarnation in a
  newborn body? The earliest written evidence we have of this refusal is found
  in the Gilgamesh Epic of about 2,700 bce., part
  of which describes Gilgamesh's search for the elixir of eternal life. In the
  following quote from N. K. Sandar's translation of "The Epic of
  Gilgamesh" Gilgamesh expresses his doubts about the truth of reincarnation.
  We also see that, so very early in history, the Chief Priestess was already
  placed under supervision of a sky-god, whom she calls father, and the Sacred
  Marriage is ridiculed:              "Come
  to me Gilgamesh, and be my bridegroom; grant me seed of your body, let me be
  your bride and you shall be my husband. Kings, rulers and princes will bow
  down before you; they shall bring you tribute from the mountains and the
  plain. Gilgamesh answered “Glorious Ishtar, If I take you in marriage, what
  gifts can I give in return? What ointment and clothing for your body? I would
  gladly give you bread and all sorts of food fit for a god. I would give you
  wine to drink fit for a queen, but as for making you my wife - that I will
  not. Your lovers have found you like a brazier which smolders in the cold, a
  backdoor which keeps out neither squall of wind nor storm, a castle which
  crushes the garrison, pitch that blackens the bearer, a battering ram turned
  back from the enemy. Which of your lovers did you ever love for ever? Listen
  to me while I tell the tale of your lovers. There was (1)Tammuz, the lover of
  your youth, for him you decreed wailing, year after year. (2) You loved the
  many colored roller (?) but still you struck and broke his wing; now in the
  grove he sits and cries "kappi, kappi, my wing, my wing". (3) You
  have loved the lion, tremendous in strength: seven pits you dug for him, and
  seven. (4) You have loved the stallion magnificent in battle, and for him you
  decreed whip and spur and a thong, to gallop seven leagues by force and to
  muddy the water before he drinks. (5) You have loved the shepherd of the
  flock; he made meal-cake for you day after day, he killed kids for your sake.
  You struck and turned him into a wolf; now his own herd-boys chase him away,
  his own dogs worry his flanks. (6) And did you not love Ishullanu, the
  gardener of your father's palm grove? He brought you baskets filled with
  dates without end; every day he loaded your table. Then you turned your eyes
  on him and said "Dear Ishullanu, come here to me, let us enjoy your
  manhood, come forward and take me, I am yours". Ishullanu answered:
  "What are you asking from me? Why should I come to such as you for food
  that is tainted and rotten?" (Gilgamesh then continues:) "But when
  you heard his answer he was changed into a blind mole, deep in the earth, one
  whose desire is always beyond his reach". "And if you and I should
  be lovers, should not I be served in the same fashion as all these others
  whom you loved once?". When Ishtar heard this she fell into a bitter
  rage, she went up to high heaven. Her tears poured out in front of her father
  Anu and Antum, her mother. "My father, Gilgamesh has heaped insults on
  me, he has told over all my abominable behaviour, my foul and hideous
  acts" etc. etc.            
  Obviously the Goddess' way of life had collapsed in Mesopotamia and
  patriarchy had taken over, although the priestesses were still very
  noticeable. It would be many centuries in the future before a philosophy
  would be developed which was able to organize and execute a devastating and
  almost successful attack on literally all aspects of the Goddess and replace
  the monolithic structure of the Goddess religion by installing a male
  dominated form of polytheism.            
  One of the unnatural changes, which took place, is clearly expressed
  in the Gilgamesh Epic when King Gilgamesh insists on being the first to sleep
  with every new bride, before the bridegroom is allowed to. Gilgamesh was
  portrayed as a physically very strong individual who also happened to be king
  with all authority associated with that position. No one had been able to
  stop him until Enkidu blocked his way:             
  "The bride waited for the bridegroom, but in the night
  Gilgamesh got up and came to this house. Then Enkidu stepped out, he stood in
  the street and blocked the way. Mighty Gilgamesh came on and Enkidu met him
  at the gate. He put out his foot and prevented Gilgamesh from entering the
  house, so they grappled, holding each other like bulls. They broke doorposts
  and the walls shook, they snorted like bulls locked together. Gilgamesh bent
  his knee with his foot planted on the ground and with a turn Enkidu was
  thrown. Then immediately his fury died" (P. 69).            
  This is a typical example of how the new male dominated religion was
  corrupting the caring and respectful traditions of the past. There is little
  doubt that this is exactly what happened. Enkidu belonged to the old religion
  that cared for the earth and all that lived on it, while Gilgamesh
  represented the newselfish attitude, there was no middle way because the
  inversion of the basics laws of behaviour had been total. This was one of the
  many reasons why so many young men from Atlantic Europe volunteered to fight
  the new order to restore justice and normality, not unlike what happened
  during World War I and II, the wars fought to end all wars. The ancient
  traditions of the Goddess had obviously been badly perverted already at this
  early date. This is clearly expressed in a quote by Frymer Kenski in "In
  the Wake of the Goddesses":            
  "The dynasty of Kish was founded by Enmebaragesi, a contemporary of
  Gilgamesh, who it now appears may have been a woman" (p. 79)   The name Enmebaragesi
  tells a story:   en. - .me - eba - ara
  - age - esi             This lady was no queen, and she
  did not found a dynasty, but she may have been a priestess. Her
  "name" tells us in no uncertain terms that the time of the Goddess
  was over, for ever.               With the breakdown
  of the old order, the Great Goddess of our ancestors was fractured into a
  plethora of more or less significant goddesses, some of which were given sex
  changes, others became warriors or witches, most were married off to the new
  sky-gods and god-kings and placed in subservient positions. Human characters
  and weaknesses of all sorts were assigned to recently invented gods and
  goddesses, from alcoholism to cruelty, cheating, brawling, weirdness etc.
  Several fearsome gods were associated with lightning and thunder, gods who
  walked and rode horses on the clouds and whose swords and spears were
  lightning bolts. This now being the age of writing, many were well documented
  by the new clergy among the Hittites, Egyptians, Sumerians, Greeks and
  Romans.. For all their temporary prominence, the newly created pantheon left
  no impression upon the population that had been unable to forget the loving
  Goddess of the past. In fact the new polytheistic mythology existed only in
  writing, having been invented by the patriarchal clergy who wanted to destroy
  the ancient Goddess mythology. and way of life. When the new monotheistic
  religion became established, reportedly by Moses, it had no trouble disposing
  of the godly weirdoes.  Perhaps even
  to this day it has not succeeded in eliminating the ancestral Goddess from
  any of the "converted, or evangelized" populations, not even from
  the Jews themselves, many of whom still revere their Shekina, while Roman Catholics and
  others revere the mother of Jesus:   Mary.   RELIGION CHANGED             It was the
  Luvian priesthood in Kizzuwadna which had the original idea of turning all
  the attributes of the Goddess' faith inside out, creating a negative image of
  the old religion, in their switch to patriarchy. They then decided to accept
  this negative image of the ancient gylanic faith as their own male-controlled
  polytheistic religion. In doing so they changed the attractive holistic
  character of the old faith into dualism, which meant the introduction of
  confrontation and discord into all aspects of life. The foundation was thus
  laid for the well-organized and aggressive woman-despising, proto-Judaic
  religion. Where this happened is not yet clear, but it was probably in Nerik, an important
  Luvian cult-town in the Hittite province of Kizzuwadna, Anatolia. The
  priesthood's library of clay tablets has apparently been found in Nerik, but Nyland (2001) has not been able to learn
  anything about the find. When the tablets are published, we may know more.
  Who the Luvian priests were that decided to invert every aspect of the
  ancient faith, is not yet known, but the process they set in motion is still
  with us today. Their main goal is expressed in the word
  "armageddon", ar.-.ma-age-ed.-.do-on.:   Armageddon: 
             It ordered a
  many-pronged attack on the established order. With the goal of destruction of
  the Goddess religion in mind, the leadership of the new male religion drew up
  a task list. It was decided to work towards:  
 
 
 
 
 
 
              
  The decision to create a variety of new languages and scripts required
  highly educated scholars and schools in which to train them. Linguistics
  became the first academic subject to be developed and taught in institutions
  that later evolved into our universities, a tradition that began about 2,000
  bce. Confused remnants of this once great discipline of linguistics are still
  being taught in our universities today, but the ancient science has been
  forgotten.             
  Inventing a new language when there is only one existing and no
  example is available to go by, may sound like an impossible task. A new and
  practical language did not come out of thin air or a dream. Fortunately for
  the Luvian priests, the ancient language was extremely logical and well
  organized.  It had been the product of
  much earlier linguists in West Africa who had
  made up groups of word- and thought-associations. They had assigned each such
  group of words a basic root syllable, made up of vowel-consonant-vowel (VCV),
  such as:   aba:     priest, rectory, advantage, surpass, shade
               This language
  structure allowed plenty of opportunity for manipulation. Any associated
  information could be attached or agglutinated to the first syllable. Methods
  were slowly developed which could convert and mutilate the language in such a
  manner that the final product was not recognizable as related to Saharan, but
  had its own rules of grammar and structure. The first step in this direction
  was the complete reversal of the periphrastic word order of Saharan; samples
  borrowed from Aulestia (p. a30):   negation+auxiliary verb+complements+ main verb             The genius who
  invented this reversal of the ancient periphrastic word order created the
  basic structure of the "family of Indo-European languages",
  something none of our modern linguists have been able to fathom, so far. The
  highly professional Luvian priests thus laid the foundation for a large
  number of invented languages and language families
  that looked like they were genetically related but were instead artificial.              That the established Neolithic order was deliberately
  turned topsy-turvy is shown in the meaning of many important words, which
  were reversed such as:            
  woman to man: andre (woman) which
  became andros (male) but in reality was an abbreviation of andrezale (fond of
  woman).  This is the reason Edo Nyland
  will not support the use of the word "androcratic", supposedly
  meaning  "male-dominated".            
  black to white: the Saharan word u'it / u'itsu (tar) was used to make the Dutch word "wit", English
  "white", cold to hot: hotz (cold) became
  "hot" in English, "heiss" in German. German
  "weiss".           
            
  hot to cold: kalda (heat) became
  "kalt" in German, "cold" in English. (In Latin
  "caldus" still means "hot".)             friend
  to foe: the Bible tells us that a "host" is an enemy,
  armed might; this agrees with Basque hostu/ohostu (to rob, to pillage).  Yet "host and hospitable" are
  now words for "friend" in English.             good to
  bad: the highly respected male clergy of the Goddess was called Abade (Priest). By
  removing the two outer vowels, our English word "bad" was created. This
  game of word distortion and meaning reversal was carried on during the next
  four millennia in all invented languages. A word
  such as ashera, from ashola-era (care-ing) was used to create our English word "ash",
  because "ashera" was also the name of the tree planted beside the
  Goddess' altar and the Bible had ordered the tree to be burned to ashes.
  (Deut. 12:3 and 2 Kings 23:15; asherim is plural).   TWO IDEOLOGIES COLLIDE             Archaeologist Dr. Marija Gimbutas in her
  book "The Civilization of the Goddess" (p.396) came to a
  somewhat different conclusion. She believed strongly in the existence of the
  Indo-Europeans. The Indo-European society she said, was warlike, exogamic,
  patriarchal, patrilineal and patrilocal, with a strong clannish organization
  and social hierarchy which gave prominence to the warrior class. Their main
  gods were male and usually depicted as warriors. There is no possibility that
  this pattern of social organization could have evolved out of the Old
  European matrilineal, matricentric and endogamic balanced society. Therefore
  the appearance of the Indo-Europeans in Europe represents a collision of two
  ideologies, not an evolution.  Edo
  Nyland took this train of thought one step further by suggesting that this
  collision between ideologies was the result of planned religious chicanery.
  He could not agree with Gimbutas that Indo-Europeans were involved in this,
  because the Indo-European theory is probably not correct.               The early religion and
  civilization had been a holistic one. Male and female had complemented each
  other in mutual respect and a well-balanced division of labor and
  responsibilities.  The women ruled the
  home base while the men ruled anything outside that, including fishing,
  exploration, big game hunting etc. The coming of male domination, which
  demanded to control all, meant that this former desirable state of affairs
  was turned topsy-turvy into dualistic confrontation between the sexes. The
  newly indoctrinated males also wanted to be shown the respect formerly
  accorded the woman, to dominate her and use and control her at will. The
  priests wanted to make sure that paternity was always known, and that never
  again would the children and the children's inheritance be handled through
  the female line. The result was that married life for many women became hell
  on earth. The German word for wife, "Frau" expresses this mentality
  well; it was coined from fa-arau, afa (happy) arau (discipline), "happy under discipline"
  and the Prussians' insecurity made sure that this discipline was enforced.
  Here follow some more changes that were brought about by the reversal of the
  Goddess' attributes.   FROM:
                                                                 TO: 
               The advance of patriarchy with its
  insistence on gathering riches and making and using weapons of destruction,
  as well as its selfishness, had removed the people from living natural lives
  in a healthy world. First they were part of, and inseparable from creation,
  but now the new definition of the word "creation" tells us that nature's wealth had been turned over to a select
  group of people: .k.-.re-ati-on.;   .k.    
  oke    okergabe      pristine   "Pristine gift to the blessed
  faithful".             All the peoples
  in Europe knew that all this was going on and did not like what they heard
  and what the travelers saw, especially in the eastern Mediterranean. The
  ancient status quo was forcibly being overthrown and they recognized the
  warning sign. Something had to be done to stop the epidemic from coming any
  closer, and they did it the best way they could. That's why Odysseus and his
  men sailed to the Eastern Mediterranean and into a huge tragedy; described in
  The Sea Peoples.  |