File: <rhipipho.htm> [For teaching purposes only; do not review, quote or
abstract] Terminology <Principal
Natural Enemy Groups>
|
COLEOPTERA, Rhipiphoridae (Reitter 1911) Please refer also to the following link for details on this
group: Rhipiphoridae = Link 1 Description & Statistics
Adult beetles are rather striking with a markedly
streamlined body, pectinate male antennae, but the color pattern of many
species is variable. Females of Macrosiagon
pusillum Gerst. may be completely red or black, or the thorax may be
of one color and the elytra and abdomen of the other. Silvestri (1905) described the genus Rhizostylops
as having certain characters and habits that seem to place it as an
intermediate form between Rhipiphoridae and Strepsiptera, and the adult
females bear a striking resemblance to those of the genera Mengenilla
and Eoxenos of Strepsiptera.
Adult females of Rhizostylops as well as those of several
species of Ripidius are apterous, degenerate and larviform (Clausen
1940/62). All species seem to be parasitic, passing at least a
portion of the larval period internally in the host body. This adaptation is virtually unknown
elsewhere in the Coleoptera.
Development is accompanied by a hypermetamorphosis that is comparable
with that in Meloidae and certain parasitic Staphylinidae. Most Rhipiphoridae seem to attack larvae of
Hymenoptera in families Andrenidae, Scoliidae, Vespidae and Tiphiidae. Those most often encountered belong to the
genera Metoecus, Ripiphorus, and Macrosiagon. Rather extensive parasitization of scoliid
and tiphiid larvae in cocoons has been observed on several occasions. In India, Tiphia pullivora
A. & J., 28.4% of field collected cocoons yielded Macrosiagon pusillum
adults. Generally all representatives
of the family developing on Hymenoptera are harmful (Clausen 1940/62). This is a small, cosmopolitan family with over
200 species known. Characters include
a serrated female antenna, male antenna pectinate or flabellate, 11-segmented
in both sexes; humpbacked, wedge-shaped beetles; pronotum large, distinct, narrowed
anteriorly; tarsal formula 5-5-4; elytra entire; abdomen with 5 visible
sternites, blunt at apex. The
maxillary palps are 4-segmented; labial palps 3-segmented; legs slender;
trochantin absent. In some species
females are apterous and larviform. All known species are solitary parasitoids
during their immature stages. Most
attack larvae of Hymenoptera in the family Andrenidae, Vespidae, Tiphiidae
and Scoliidae. Some parasitize adult
and nymphal cockroaches. Both primary
and hyperparasitic species are known.
First instar larvae are phoretic.
Larvae under hypermetamorphosis.
Cockroach parasitoids are internal, while those species parasitizing
Hymenoptera are internal only during the 1st instar. Adults are free-living. Biology & Behavior
Ripidius spp.
departs from the normal behavior for the family, both in host preferences and
in relationships. Ripidius pectinicornis
Thbg. was originally described as early as 1808, as a parasitoid of Blatella
germanica L. under the name of Symbius blattarum Sund.
by Sundervall in 1831 (Clausen 1940).
Mature larvae were found in the bodies of cockroaches on a ship, and
adult females were observed to lay their eggs abundantly. Stamm (1935, 1936) extended studies on the
behavior and larval forms of this species.
Schultze, cited by Clausen (1940) recorded rearing R. scutellaris
Hell. from Blattidae in the Philippines, and R. boissyi Abeille
is parasitic in nymphs of Ectobia in Europe. The whole genus seems restricted to Blattidae. It is also distinguished in habit from
those developing on larvae of Hymenoptera, by passing its entire larval
period within the host. R. pectinicornis
is gregarious, with 1-5 developing in each host, while those on Hymenoptera
are consistently solitary. Extensive observations have been made on Metoecus
paradoxus L., which is common in Europe as a parasitoid of Vespa
spp. larvae. The parasitic
relationship was recognized early in 1864 by Westwood (cited by Clausen,
1940). Chapman (1870, 1891, 1897) first
thought this species was a commensal in the nest. Murray (1870a,b) agreed with the conclusions of Westwood. Rouget (1873) obtained oviposition in the
laboratory and thought that under field conditions the eggs are laid on
blossoms, foliage, etc., and that the young larvae are then carried to the
nest by Vespa adults. Chapman
later found the much distended 1st instar larva, 10X their original length,
within the bodies of the host larvae, just beneath the integument of the 4th
of 5th segment. Only a part of the
1st stage is passed internally, and the 2nd instar larva is found as a collar
encircling the cervix of the host. Reproductive capacity of Rhipiphoridae is
relatively high, which is expected because of a high mortality in the 1st
larval stage. Chobaut (1891) noted
that the female of Macrosiagon flabellatum F. lays ca. 500
eggs, and Silvestri recorded ca. 3,000 for R. inquirendus
Silv. Eggs are usually laid in
clusters, with the site of oviposition being variable. M. flabellatum lays its eggs
in clusters in the soil, covering them lightly with earth. jarvis (1922) found that M. cucullatum
Macl. laid the eggs close together among the hairs on the undersides of the
leaves of Urenia and Ficus.
Over 100 were found on a single leaf, covering an area of ca. 9-10
sq-cm. Metoecus paradoxus
lays the eggs in crevices in decaying wood.
Ripiphorus subdipterus Bosc. was found to oviposit in
the blossoms of Eryngium (Chobaut 1906), and R. solidaginis
Pierce does so in the green buds of goldenrod, Solidago rigida
(Pierce 1904). There are numerous
adaptations correlated with the location of the host stages and with the
habits of the host adults in case the latter serve as carriers of the
triungulinids. In no case were eggs
found to be placed on or in close proximity to the host stages on which
development of the larva occurs (Clausen 1940/62). Of particular interest is the manner by which
the triungulinids gain access to the host, because it involves transportation
by some agency from the vicinity of hatching to the host larvae in their
cells. It is believed that the
triungulinids themselves do not take an active search for either the host
stages or the carrier but rather that they take up a position favorable to contact
with a carrier and then wait for it.
Triungulinids of M. flabellatum attach themselves to Odynerus
adults and are thus carried to the nest (Chobaut 1906). Pierce (1904) thought that the
triungulinids of R. solidaginis are carried by the Ripiphorus
adults themselves, which are thought to hibernate in the holes of Epinomia. This explanation is in view of the
occurrence of the triungulinids on opening buds of Solidago, a plant
that is not frequented by Epinomia adults. However, many of them were found on the bodies of bees of
various genera living in the Epinomia community. Triungulinids of R. subdipterus
are found on Eryngium blossoms and are thought to attach themselves to
Halictus adults frequenting this plant (Clausen 1940/62). Macrosaigon cucullatum
is parasitic on larvae of Campsomeris spp. in Australia. The wasps are external parasitoids of
scarab grubs in soil. Triungulinids
of Macrosaigon are found on the foliage of certain trees and the
problem of reaching host larvae in the soil, which are themselves parasitic
and thus receive no attention from the parent females, is more complex than
that facing the species mentioned previously. Laboratory studies indicated that the triungulinids probably
attach themselves to the Campsomeris females and are thus carried into
the soil at the time the latter oviposit and that at this time they transfer
to the scarab grub and await the hatching of the Campsomeris egg and
its subsequent development as a larva.
One triungulinid was found to remain motionless on an egg on a
paralyzed grub for 3 days, during which it made no effort to pierce the
chorion. Although development is
completed only on the mature larva in the cocoon, it is probable that the
triungulinid attaches itself to the partially grown larva or enters its body
prior to cocoon formation (Clausen 1940/62).
Triungulinids do not effect parasitization of scoliid or tiphiid
larvae after the cocoon has been spun. Among scoliid and tiphiid hosts of various
Rhipiphoridae, it is evident that if the triungulinids of the parasitoid are
carried into the soil by the females at the time of oviposition, the extent
of parasitization of the different species will vary greatly in the same
locality, due to diverse feeding habits of the adults. Scoliid females feed mainly at blossoms,
while the spring species of Tiphiidae feed almost exclusively on insect
honeydew and the summer and autumn species mostly on the secretions from
various nectar glands of plants. The
relatively high mortality of Tiphia pullivora previously
mentioned, is possibly linked to a more general tendency to feed at blossoms
than is shown by other species in the field during the same season (Clausen
1940/62). A simple parasitic relationship in this family
seems to exist in respect to the Ripidius species which attack nymphs and
adults of cockroaches. In this genus
the eggs are thought to be laid indiscriminately in crevices, etc., and the
triungulinids attach themselves directly to passing hosts and enter the body
to develop, thus eliminating the requirement of a carrier. Triungulinids of all species are equipped with
a caudal sucker and 1-2 pairs of cerci of varying length which they use to
assume an erect position, with the legs entirely free, while waiting to
attach to passing insects, etc. They
are thought to have the jumping habit which is common to larvae of this kind. The fee-living phase of larval life may extend
over a considerable length of time, during which food does not seem to be
required. However, Pierce (1904)
believed that the triungulinids of Ripiphorus solidaginis fed
on the plant tissues or sap of Solidago soon after hatching. He based this conclusion on (1) that they
are of considerably greater size than the egg, and (2) that they are found
only on Solidago, which is not frequented by host bees. It was assumed that this plant was
utilized in preference to others, in order to fulfill these food
requirements. A transitory plant
feeding habit such as this is not in accord with the habits of larvae of this
type, and the evidence presented does not definitely establish its
occurrence. The increase in size may
possibly have been the result of imbibing moisture from the leaf surface
(Clausen 1940). With exception of Ripidius pectinicornis
and Ripidius spp. which pass the entire larval feeding period within
the cockroach host, all known species develop externally, having an internal
phase only in the 1st stage.
Sometimes this internal period is short, but in M. flabellatum,
entry into the Odynerus larva occurs during late summer, and the
parasitoid larva does not emerge for external feeding until the following
June. The developmental cycle and
larval habits are comparable to those of certain Perilampidae, in particular
species with hyperparasitic habits.
Usually the host larva is not killed until it has completed feeding
and it prepared to pupate. The cells
containing parasitized Vespa
larvae and those of other host groups of similar habit as well are thus
closed in the normal way. In the case
of Scoliidae and Tiphiidae, the cocoons are spun before death (Clausen
1940/62). Transition from internal to external feeding
has been observed in Macrosiagon flabellatum and Metoecus
paradoxus (Grandi 1937). In
the former species, the greatly distended triungulinid, which is several
hundred times as large by volume as when newly hatched (see Clausen, 1940 for
diagrams), emerges through a puncture in the 3rd thoracic segment of the
host, immediately casts it exuviae, which remains in the puncture, and then
assumes the feeding position in which it is found as a collar around the 1st
or 2nd thoracic segment (see Clausen, 1940 for diagram). The triungulinid increases in length from
0.5 mm. at hatching to 2.5 mm. just prior to the first molt. The host larva is eventually consumed. Life Cycle
Most species of Rhipiphoridae seem to have only
one generation per year, which is closely correlated with the cycle of the
host. Ripiphorus solidaginis
overwinters in the adult stage and lays eggs early in springtime, with the
adult stage attained again in August (Pierce 1904). However, Metoecus paradoxus lays its eggs in late
autumn, and the fully developed embryo persists in the egg until
springtime. Macrosaigon flabellatum
lays its eggs in late summer, and overwinters as 1st instar larvae within the
body of Odynerus larvae. M.
pusillum is thought to have the same hibernation habit, for adults
emerge from Tiphia cocoons during July. Barber (1939) discussing observations of J. C. Bridwell on Ripiphorus
sp., parasitic on Augochlora pura Say, mentioned that the
triungulinids are found attached to the hairs of hibernating inseminated
female hosts. They overwinter in this
way, on the hibernating female bee, and transfer to her brood cells when
these are formed in spring. R.
solidaginis is believed to have 2 generations annually; Ripidius
pectinicornis, developing in cockroaches in the tropics, probably has
a short cycle, with several generations each year (Clausen 1940/62). In M. flabellatum and M. cucullatum,
the incubation period i 17 and 7.5 days, respectively. Larval feeding of Metoecus paradoxus
covers only 12-14 days. For detailed descriptions of immature stages of
Rhipiphoridae, please see Clausen (1940/62). References: Please refer
to <biology.ref.htm>, [Additional
references may be found at: MELVYL Library] Linsley,
E. G. & J. W. MacSwain.
1951. Bull. Calif. Ins. Surv.
1: 79-88. Linsley,
E. G., J. W. MacSwain & R. F. Smith.
1952. Univ. Calif. Publ. Ent.
9: 291-314. Selander,
R. B. 1957. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 50:
88-103. |