|
Theory of
Language Formation
[Contacts]
The efforts of Edo
Nyland in translating ancient inscriptions have resulted in the
development of a controversial theory on the origin of languages. The main hypotheses and theory are shown
as follows: [also see Linguistics
& Human
Migrations & Language]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hypothesis 1: The Saharan
language was the language of the peoples living in the Sahara during the last
Ice Age. They had created the first
true civilization on earth, possibly centered on lake Chad. As a result of
deglaciation, starting about 16,000 bce., resulting in ever expanding
desertification, these tribes were forced to flee for their lives, creating
an exodus culminating between 7,000 and 3,500 bce (see Climate).
These refugees created four main secondary civilizations in Mesopotamia,
Egypt, the Indus Valley and Anatolia.
Hypothesis 2:
Portions of the Saharan language is still spoken as
Dravidian in India (170
million speakers), as Ainu on the island of Hokkaido (18,000 speakers in 2005) and
as Basque in Euskadi, Spain (800,000 speakers in 2005). Basque is likely the
closest resembling the original language of the exodus.
Hypothesis 3: The
people of the exodus from the Sahara brought with them a matrilineal
organized society, the nature based Goddess religion and the first highly
developed language, maintained by very strong oral traditions.
Hypothesis 4:
As a result of several major advances in a number of fields such as
agriculture, metallurgy, domestication of the horse and camel, astronomy etc.
the female-based religion was weakened and male domination arrived ca 3,000
bce. in Egypt, Mesopotamia and Anatolia, and about 1,500 bce. in India. The
newcomers brought along learned priesthoods who proceeded to invert all
aspects of the old religion, society, language, legends etc. A new language
was invented for each large area and placed under
the control of a king, e.g., Sumerian and
Akadian in Mesopotamia, Old Egyptian in Egypt, Sanskrit and Hindi in India, Hebrew in Palestine, Hittite and Luvian in Anatolia etc. All
these were the product of formulaic distortion and scholarly manipulation of
the original Saharan language. The Bible repeats the command to distort the
original language in Genesis 11:7.
Hypothesis 5:
These newly created languages were then introduced to the local populations
by taking young boys into residential schools and forcing the new order onto
them, where they were often brutally treated. The purpose was to destroy the
old religion and language and the traditional oral teaching of wisdom,
religion and legends, replacing it with a patriarchal vision of the world and
civilization. They almost succeeded. The hidden sentences in the invented
words can be decoded ) with the use of the
Basque dictionary and a simple formula (see Saharan).
Theory:
Nyland
(2001) proposed that all highly developed languages on earth (except possibly
Chinese) might have been developed from the original Saharan language, which in itself was also scholarly
enhanced from the Neolithic substratum. There exists no
"family" of Indo-European or Semitic languages. There are no
Indo-European or proto-Indo-European languages. All these unstable languages were invented
by scholars. Only Saharan has remained relatively unchanged and is now spoken as
Basque.
[Please also see Evolution of Human Languages
and The Indo-Europeans and the Concept of Language
Families]
|