FILE: <ch-35.htm> GENERAL INDEX
[Navigate to
MAIN MENU ]
[For
educational purposes only; do not review, quote or abstract]
|
COTTONY-CUSHION SCALE, Icerya purchasi Maskell -- Homoptera, Margarodidae (Contacts) Native to Australia, cottony-cushion scale is widespread
throughout most subtropical and
tropical areas and warmer temperate regions of the world (Kennett et al.
1999). It has a wide host range and
has the capacity to weaken or kill mature trees. It is adapted to a wide range of climates and is a pest of
numerous fruit and shade trees and shrubs, being especially important on
citrus, mango and guava. This particular project was referred to by DeBach (1974),<PHOTO>, as the one
that, "... established the biological control method like a shot heard
around the world." The
cottony-cushion scale was discovered on Acacia
in Menlo Park, central California around 1868, from which is spread
rapidly. Folllowing its discovery on
acacia in northern California around 1868, by 1886 its effect on the new
citrus industry in southern California was devastating. Citrus growers tried washes and cyanide
fumigation but these were not effective.
Damage was so extensive that many growers abandoned or burned their
trees and real estate values plummeted (DeBach 1974). Alarmed California horticultural officials
began inquiries and enlisted the aid of Charles V.
Riley <PHOTO>, Chief of
the U. S. Dept. of Agriculture, Division of Entomology. Riley emerged as the dominant figure in
this project but others made more important contributions. The principal foreign explorer involved was Albert
Koebele, <PHOTO>, while D. W. Coquillett <PHOTO> played the
important role of receiving and colonizing the imported natural enemies. In 1885 Riley sent A. Koebele <PHOTO> to Alameda,
California, at a salary of $100.00 per month to conduct an
"investigation of the history and habits of insects of
California." About the same
Riley appointed Coquillett, a skilled amateur entomologist from Anaheim,
California, as field agent to work on the control of the cottony-cushion
scale around Los Angeles. In February
1886 both men were assigned to work together at Los Angeles on the scale. Riley was trying to determine the native home of the
cottony-cushion scale by correspondence in order to begin the exploration
phase of the project. By 1887
officials in California were also trying to locate its source. DeBach (1974) suggests that possibly
stimulated by such correspondence, Frazer Crawford, an entomologist of
Adelaide, Australia, discovered in 1886 the parasitic fly Cryptochaetum (= Lestophonus) iceryae Williston, an effective
natural enemy of the scale. Early in
1887 Crawford wrote to Riley that I.
purchasi in Adelaide was
destroyed by a dipterous parasitoid and sent drawings of the fly and also specimens
which the U. S. Department of Agriculture received in February 1887. At first Riley doubted its parasitic
status, because no true dipterous fly parasitoids of scale insects were then
known. Later he became convinced of
its importance and this became the main objective in Koebele's exploration
trip to Australia. Riley also
recommended in 1886 that the natural enemies of the cottony-cushion scale be
investigated in Australia and introduced into California. The same year the California Fruit Growers'
Convention petitioned Congress to appropriate funds for the USDA to do the
work. However, Congress refused and
maintained that USDA funds could not be spent in foreign travel. The California Fruit Growers' Convention invited Riley in April
1887 to provide a remedy for the cottony-cushion scale epizootic, where he
stated his belief that the scale came from Australia where it was harmless
and probably not from New Zealand where it was recorded as a serious
pest. He assumed that parasitoids
regulated the scale at low densities in Australia and again recommended that
they be investigated and imported into California. He offered to send an entomologist to do this but that the US
Congress would consider the idea absurd.
Thus he asked that the State of California or Los Angeles County
appropriate a few thousand dollars to import the natural enemies. Although the Convention again adopted a
resolution in favor of sending someone to Australia for natural enemies, no funds
were generated from California. Around that time, the California State Inspector of Fruit Pests, W. G. Klee, corresponded with W. M.
Maskell <PHOTO> in Auckland, New Zealand (Maskell had described the
scale as a new species from Auckland in 1978) and with Frazer Crawford in
Adelaide, Australia. Maskell told
Klee positively that Australia was the native home (letter was published in
the Pacific Rural Press, May 7, 1887).
Subsequently Riley, who meanwhile had reconsidered where the country
of origin might be and was suggesting Mauritius (letter to Pacific Rural Press,
June 4, 1887), agreed that Australia was probably the native home (letter in Pacific Rural Press,
March 4, 1888). As a result of Klee's correspondence, Frazer Crawford
with considerable effort collected and sent some live Cryptochaetum to Klee who liberated the flies on
cottony-cushion scale in San Mateo County near San Francisco in early 1888 before Koebele sailed for
Australia--ostensibly to get the same flies (DeBach 1974). This probably resulted in Cryptochaetum's establishment
because it eventually became common in California and there is doubt that
Koebele's later shipments to Los Angeles did survive after release. Financing for Koebele's trip to Australia was through some
skillful political maneuvering. In
1888 an International Exposition was to be held in Melbourne, Australia, and
a US exhibit was planned through the U.S. State Department. Through the efforts of Riley, N.
J. Coleman, The California Commissioner of Agriculture and others, the U. S.
Secretary of State was persuaded to allocate $2,000 to pay the travel
expenses of an e4ntomologist who was to represent the U. S. State Department
at the Exposition. Riley selected
Albert Koebele, his assistant, who sailed from San Francisco on August 25,
1888. Koebele experienced few of the problems in Australia that plagued
some of the later foreign explorers.
As an official representative of the U.S. State Department and the U.
S. Department of Agriculture, he received utmost cooperation and was
accompanied by knowledgeable local entomologists or growers, who often led
him to known pockets of the otherwise rare cottony-cushion scale. He was also furnished with free passes by
the State railways in Australia.
After he arrived in Sydney on September 20, 1888, Koebele searched for
four days and found only a few Icerya
and no natural enemies. The local
orange growers had no knowledge of the scale. Proceeding to Melbourne by train, he searched for some six days
but found no Icerya. He then went to Adelaide with a letter of
introduction to Frazer Crawford, and the next day in gardens in Adelaide Icerya was found, with the very
first scale examined containing nine pupae of Cryptochaetum iceryae. Nearly all the scales examined in Adelaide
were parasitized. While collecting scales for shipment to California with Crawford
in a North Adelaide garden on October 15th, Koebele related on July 1889 (after his return to California), "I
discovered there, for the first time, feeding upon a large female Icerya, the
Lady-bird, which will become famed in the United States--Vedalia cardinalis."
<PHOTO>. By this time
the beetle was showing its potential in California. Koebele had written to Riley about his discovery and Riley
replied that he thought that Cryptochaetum
was probably the most promising, but to try others as well. Koebele then went to Mannum in the Murray River valley, where
much of today's oranges are grown.
There he found the scale being parasitized by Cryptochaetum, the Rodolia (= Vedalia, = Novius) cardinalis
Mulsant and a predatory green lacewing.
He returned within a week to Adelaide with material that was placed in
a cool cellar to await shipment to California. On October 24-25 he collected more scales in North Adelaide,
along with many parasitic flies and green lacewings. He described his first shipment as: "I finished collecting for my first shipment on the 25th and
estimated that I had about 6000 Icerya, which in return would produce at an
average about four parasites [Lestophonus = Cryptochaetum] each. They were packed partly in wooden and
partly in tin boxes. Small branches
generally full of scales were cut so as to fit exactly lengthwise into the
box. With these the boxes were filled
and all loose scales placed in between, plenty of space remaining for any of
the insects within to move about freely without danger of being crushed by
loose sticks. Salicylic acid was used
in small quantities in the tin boxes to prevent mold, yet these, as I have
been informed by Mr. Coquillett, arrived in a more or less moldy condition,
while those in wooden boxes always arrived safe. In addition, Dr. Schomburgh, director of the botanical gardens
at Adelaide, kindly fitted up for me a Wardian case which was filled with
living plants of orange and Pittosporum
in pots. Large numbers of Icerya were
placed in this, and such larvae as were found feeding upon them...The object
of this was to have the Lestophonus
go on breeding within the case during the voyage. No doubt many infested scales arrived in Los Angeles." "I found [later] on examining the tree [in Los Angeles], on
April 12, 1889, under which this case had been placed with a tent over it,
that from several of the Iceryas the Lestophonus
had issued. This case, as Mr.
Coquillett informed me in a letter of November 30, arrived in good condition,
except that the putty had been knocked off in several places, leaving holes
large enough for the parasites to escape.
Before opening the case he found two coccinellid larvae crawling on
the outside, and these when placed with the Icerya attacked it at once. He further said that there were only about
half a dozen living Chrysopa
adults. This would show that the Lestophonus
was still issuing on arrival in California and all turned out more favorably
than I had anticipated on seeing the box handled in such a rough manner by
the steamer hands at Sydney, to which point I accompanied this as well as all
the subsequent shipments. I expected
little good would come out of this method of sending and therefore concluded
to send only small parcels on ice thereafter, as had been partly done at
first. If once the insects could be
placed in good condition in the ice-house on the steamer just before leaving,
where a temperature of 38° Fah. at first and about 46° Fah. on arrival in San
Francisco existed, they must arrive safely.
To accomplish this, the parasites with their hosts were all collected
the last three days before leaving Adelaide, and on arriving home were
immediately placed in a cool cellar.
On the trip from Adelaide to Sydney, which takes two days by train, y
insects came generally in an ice-box on the sleeping-car." Koebele then surveyed other areas in Victoria and New South Wales
but concluded that the Adelaide area was best, so returned on November 8,
1888. After collecting about 6,000
scales in five days and making a trip to Melbourne for additional material,
he left Adelaide for Sydney with the second shipment. He writes: "On the 26th I left Adelaide on my way to Sydney, with what
I considered even a better shipment than the first. Unfortunately this lot arrived in a bad condition at San
Francisco, owing to a gale on the route when the parcels fell off the shelving
in the ice-house, in which they had been placed, and most of them were
crushed by cakes of ice falling on them." Koebele made a third shipment in late December and then travelled
to Brisbane, where he found only a few specimens of Icerya and slowly returned to Melbourne with very poor
collecting along the way. At
Melbourne he collected Cryptochaetum
on a related scale, Monophloebus
sp. He then collected Icerya with parasitoids and
about 200 Rodolia cardinalis in the Sydney Town
Hall garden, being now either more proficient at collecting or luckier than
during his first trip to Sydney.
Under instructions from Riley to study Icerya in New Zealand on his way home, he boarded ship on
January 13, 1889 with his insects in the cold room, and arrived in Auckland,
New Zealand on January 28th. The
scales with parasitoids and Rodolia
beetles were found to be in excellent condition at Auckland and were repacked
in wooden boxes with fresh Icerya
found in Auckland, and apparently were sent on to California. He found no natural enemies in Auckland;
however at Napier he found large numbers of Rodolia cardinalis
feeding on Icerya. According to Koebele this predator had
arrived in Auckland by chance, where Icerya
was destroying host plants five years previously, and there it cleaned nearly
the whole district around Auckland within about two years. At the time of Koebele's visit the
predator was dispersing into new areas, hence his big collection of about
6,000 specimens of Rodolia cardinalis at Napier. Returning to Auckland, these were placed
in the ship's cool-room at 4° C (38° F).
He left Auckland on February 25th and arrived in San Francisco,
Saturday evening March 16th, 1889. The
material could not be sent to Coquillett at Los Angeles until the following Monday
and he received it on March 20th, 34 days since collection and 29 days on
ice. Yet this arrived in better
condition than any previous shipment.
The specimens were liberated under the same caged tree in Los Angeles
that had received the earlier specimens, which was on the property of F. W. Wolfskill.
According to Coquillett's records, 129 living Rodolia cardinalis
were liberated through January 24, 1889.
On February 21, 35 Rodolia
arrived and were colonized on the property of J. R.
Dobbins in San Gabriel. The final
shipment of 350 live Rodolia
that was brought personally by Koebele on the ship was colonized on March 20,
1889. About one-third went to the
Dobbin's grove and the remainder to the large A. S.
Chapman grove in the San Gabriel valley. Altogether there were about 12,000 living Cryptochaetum iceryae
received from Koebele, which were all put under one caged tree. When the tree was examined on April 12,
1889 he noted that very few Cryptochaetum
remained of the vast numbers of flies received. Rodolia cardinalis had
killed nearly all the Icerya
at the Wolfskill tree by early April 1889.
Therefore, one side of the cage was removed and the beetles were
allowed to move to adjoining trees.
On April 12, Coquillett began sending colonies to other parts of the
State. By June 12, two months after
the cage was opened, 10,555 Rodolia
cardinalis had been
distributed to 208 different growers and successful colonization occurred in
nearly every case. Within six months
of the first release of 28 beetles and with a total release of only 129, the
original trees in Wolfskill's orchard were virtually Icerya-free and the beetles had spread to a distance of
3/4 mile. In his Annual Report for
1889 Riley stated that in the original orchard (Wolfskill) practically all
the scales were killed before August 1889 and further that by the end of 1889
Icerya was no longer a
factor to be considered in citrus growing in California. Coquillett wrote in 1889 regarding the San
Gabriel colonization of February and March: "All of these colonies have thrived exceedingly well. During a recent visit to each of these
groves I found the lady-birds on trees fully one-eighth of a mile from those
on which the original colonies were placed, having thus distributed
themselves of their own accord. The
trees I colonized them on in the grove of Dobbins were quite large and were
thickly infested with the Iceryas,
but at the time of my recent visit scarcely a living Icerya could be found on these and on several adjacent
trees, while the dead and dry bodies of the Iceryas still clinging to the trees by the beaks,
indicated how thickly the trees had been infested with these pests, and how
thoroughly the industrious lady-birds had done their work." J. R. Dobbins reported on July 1889, only four months after the
first beetles were released: "The vedalia has multiplied in numbers and spread so rapidly
that every one of my 3200 orchard trees is literally swarming with them. All of my ornamental trees, shrubs, and
vines which were infested with white scale, are practically cleansed by this
wonderful parasite. About one month
since I made a public statement that my orchard would be free from Icerya by November 1 [1889],
but the work has gone on with such amazing speed and thoroughness that I am
today confident that the pest will have been exterminated from my trees by
the middle of August. People are
coming here daily, and by placing infested branches upon the ground beneath
my trees for two hours, can secure colonizes of thousands of the vedalias,
which are there in countless numbers seeking food. Over 50000 have been taken away to other orchards during the
past week, and there are millions still remaining, and I have distributed a
total of 63000 since June 1." The Dobbins orchard was so completely free of Icerya that on July 31 he
posted a notice that he had no more beetles for distribution. The other colonized grove in San Gabriel
was similarly cleaned of scale (DeBach 1974). In 1888 A. S. Chapman stated that he was being forced to
abandon citrus growing on account of scales, while in October 1889 he stated
that Rodolia had cleaned up
the scale on 150 acres. In just one
year shipments of oranges from Los Angeles County increased dramatically from
700 to 2,000 freight train car lost. Riley in 1893 (DeBach 1974) published the following: "Mr. William F. Channing, of Pasadena,
one of the eminent Unitarian divine, wrote two years later [in 1891]: We owe
to the Agricultural Department the rescue of our orange culture by the
importation of the Australian lady-bird, Vedalia
cardinalis." "The white scales were incrusting our orange trees with a
hideous leprosy. They spread with
wonderful rapidity and would have made citrus growth on the whole North
American continent impossible within a few years. It took the Vedalia, where introduced, only a few weeks
absolutely to clean out the white scale.
The deliverance was more like a miracle than anything I have ever
seen. In the spring of 1889 I had
abandoned my young Washington navel orange trees as irrecoverable. Those same trees bore from two to three
boxes of oranges apiece at the end of the season (or winter and spring of
1890). The consequence of the
deliverance is that many hundreds of thousands of orange trees (navels almost
exclusively) have been set out in southern California this last spring." Out of a total original stock of 514 beetles colonized from the
end of November 1888 to late March 1889 the rapidity and extent of this
control was nearly unbelievable (DeBach 1974). Coquillett in a letter to Riley, October 21, 1889, summarized
it as follows: "The first half of the year I devoted nearly the whole of my
time to propagating and distributing the Australia Lady-bird (Vedalia cardinalis) recently introduced by this Division. At the present time it is very difficult
to find a living Fluted Scale (Icerya
purchasi Maskell) in the
vicinity of this city [Los Angeles], so thoroughly has the Lady-bird done its
work; and, indeed, the same is true of nearly the entire southern part of the
state, as well as of many localities in the northern part." DeBach (1974) reported that by 1890 all infestations in the State
had been completely decimated. The
cost, aside from Koebele's and Coquillett's salaries, was about $1,500.00;
and all told less than $5,000.00.
Benefits to the citrus industry of California have amounted to
millions of dollars annually ever since and as an aftermath similar successes
have been attained over the years in more than fifty countries around the
world by transfer of Rodolia
cardinalis and to a lesser
extent of Cryptochaetum iceryae. Albert Koebele immediately became famous
and continued as a foreign explorer for the USDA and later for Hawaii,
although he never again achieved such a spectacular success. In California special funds were raised
and Koebele was presented with a gold watch and his wife with a pair of
diamond earrings. DeBach (1974) relates that as a sequel to this story, Cryptochaetum iceryae had been increasing in California
and eventually became dominant in coastal areas, which includes Los Angeles
where Rodolia attained its
first notoriety. Research since has
shown that Cryptochaetum
alone would have done just as spectacular a control in the citrus areas of
1890 as did Rodolia. However, with expansion of citrus to
hotter, drier interior areas of California, Rodolia is the most important biological control factor. Kennett et al (1999) mention the importation of another
coccinellid, Rodolia
koebelei (Horn),
which was introduced from Australia in 1892.
Although it became established and persisted for a number of years, it
was eventually displaced by R.
cardinalis. Later studies in southern California by Quezada, <PHOTO>, (Quezada & DeBach 1973) revealed that Rodolia cardinalis and Cryptochaetum
iceryae impacted their host
in concert, with Rodolia
tending to displace Cryptochaetum
in arid areas, the reverse being true along coastal areas while in
intermediate areas both tended to be commonly present, depending on
environmental fluctuations. Greathead
(1976) reported that in colder climates Rodolia
is frequently eliminated during winter and recolonization is necessary to
maintain control. Cryptochaetum has a more
restrictive range of adaptability and has not been successfully introduced to
as many areas as Rodolia. For greater detail on the various aspects of this biological
control effort please refer to the following references (Riley 1887,
Coquillet 1889, Marchal 1908, Savastano 1919, Kuwana 1922, Autuori 1928,
Gomez-Clemente 1929, Poutiers 1930, Thorpe 1930, Essig 1931, Leonard 1932,
Bazduireva 1933, Bodenheimer 1933, Bodenheimer & Tenenbaum 1934, Wolcott
& Sein 1933, Chen 1934, Stepanov 1935, Wille 1935, 1941; Ramachandra Rao
& Cherian 1944, Geier & Baggiolina 1950, Pruthi 1950, Subramaniam
1954, 1955; Bartlett & Lagace 1960). REFERENCES: [Additional references may be found at: MELVYL
Library ] Anonymous. 1917. Investigations on the coccinellid,
vedalia, and the scale-insect Icerya. Dept. Agric. & Com. Plant Path. &
Injur. Insects Bull. 3: 107 p. (Abs.
in REv. Appl. Ent. (A), 6: 282). Autuori, M. 1928. Syneura
infraposita Borgm.-Schmitz
(Diptera: Phoridae) um novo parasita da Icerya
purchasi Mask. Inst. Biol., Sao Paulo, Arch 1: 193-200.
[in Portuguese w/ English summary]. Balachowsky, A.
1932. Observations biologique
sur l'adaptation de Novius cardinalis Muls. aux depens de Gueriniella serratulae F. (Contribution a
l'etude des coccides de france; 6 note).
Rev. Pathol. Veg. Ent. Agric. Fr. 19:
11-17. Bartlett, B. R.
1978. Coccidae. In: C. P. Clausen (ed.), Introduced Parasites
and Predators of Arthropod Pests and Weeds.
U. S. Dept. Agric. Agric. Handbk. No. 480, Washington, D.C. 545 p. Bartlett, B. R. & C. F. Lagace. 1960. Interference with
biological control of cottony-cushion scale by insecticides and attempts to
reestablish a favorable natural balance.
J. Econ. Ent. 53: 1055-58. Bazduireva, V. I.
1933. The fluted scale (Icerya purchasi Mask.) and its control. A review of literature.
Plant Protect. (Leningrad) (1932) 3:
35-64. [in Russian]. Bodenheimer, F. S.
1933. Icerya purchasi
Mask. and Novius cardinalis Muls. Ztschr. f. angew. Ent. 19: 514-43. Bodenheimer, F. S. & B. Tenenbaum. 1934. Icerya purchasi Mask. and its control in Palestine. Hadar:
32-4. Chen, F. 1934. Notes on two coccinellids of Hwang-Yeh,
Chekiang. Ent. & Phytopath
2: 142-48. [in Chinese]. Clausen, C. P.
1978a. Biological control of
citrus insects. Chapter 6, Vol. IV. In: The Citrus Industry.
Univ. of Calif. Div. Agric. Sci., Berkeley, Calif. 362 p. Coquillet, D. W.
1889. The imported Australian
lady-bird. Insect Life 2: 70-4. DeBach, P. 1964. Successes, trends and future
possibilities. In: P. DeBach
(ed.), Biological Control of Insect Pests and Weeds. Reinhold Publ. Co., New York. 844 p. DeBach, P. 1974. Biological Control by Natural
Enemies. Cambridge Univ. Press. 323 p. Doutt, R. L. 1958. Vice, virtue and the vedalia. Bull. Ent. Soc. Amer. 4: 119-23. Doutt, R. L. 1964. The historical development of biological
control. Chapter 2, In: P. DeBach (ed.), Biological Control of Insect Pests and
Weeds. Reinhold Publ. Co., New
York. 844 p. Essig, E. O. 1931. A History of Entomology. MacMillan Co., New York. 1029 p. Geier, P. & M. Baggiolini.
1950. Quelques observationes
sur la biologie de Pericerya
purchasi Mask. au Tessin
(Homop., Margaroid.). Schweitz. Ent.
Gesell. Mitt. 23: 104-16. Gomez-Clemente, F.
1929. La lucha natural.
Estudio acerca de la Icerya purchasi Mask. y de su parásito
el Novius cardinalis Muls. Estac. Fitopatol. Agric. Valencia. 53p. Greathead, D. J.
1976. A review of biological
control in western and southern Europe.
Tech. Comm. No. 7, CIBC.
Commonw. Agr. Bur., Farnham Royal, Slough, England. 182 p. Kennett, C. E., J. A. McMurtry & J. W. Beardsley. 1999.
Biological control in subtropical and tropical crops. In: Bellows, T. S. & T. W. Fisher (eds.), Handbook of Biological Control:
Principles and Applications.
Academic Press, San Diego, New York.
1046 p Koebele, A. 1890. Report of a trip to Australia to
investigate the natural enemies of the fluted scale. U. S. Dept. Agric., Bur. Ent. Bull.
21: 1-32. Kuwana, I. 1922. Studies
on Japanese Monophelebinae. Contrib.
II. the genus Icerya. Japan Dept. Agric. & Com., Imp. Plant
Quart. Sta. Bull. 2. 43 p. Leonard, M. D. 1932. The cottony cushion scale in Puerto
Rico. J. Econ. Ent. 25: 1103-07. Marchal, P. 1908. The utilization of auxiliary entomophagous
insects in the struggle against insects injurious to agriculture. Pop. Sci. Monthly (Apr.): 352-419. Poutiers, R. 1930. Sur le comportemente du Novius cardinalis (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae) vis-a-vis de
certains alcaloides. Soc. de Biol.
(Paris) Compt. Rend. 103, 1023-25. Pruthi, H. S. 1950. A foreign insect menace to Indian citrus
industry checked. Indian Farming
11: 5-6. Quayle, H. J. 1938. Insects of Citrus and Other Subtropical
Fruits. Comstock Publishing Co.,
Ithaca, New York. 583 p. Quezada, J. R. & P. DeBach.
1973. Bioecological and
population studies of the cottony-cushion scale, Icerya purchasi
Mask. and its natural enemies, Rodolia
cardinalis Mul. Cryptochaetum iceryae Will., in southern
California. Hilgardia 41: 631-88. Ramachandra Rao, R. S. Y. & M. C. Cherian. 1944.
The fluted scale, Icerya
purchasi Mask., as a pest of
wattle in south India, and its control by the biological method. Madras Agric. J. 32: 20. Riley, C. V. 1887. The Icerya
or fluted scale, otherwise known as the cotton cushion scale. U. S. Dept. Agric., Div. Ent. Bull.
15. 40 p. Riley, C. V. 1893. Parasitic and predaceous insects in
applied entomology. Insect Life
6: 130-41. Savastano, L. 1919. La ginestra etnea e la cumune, l'Iceria e il Novius. Acireale R. Staz. Sper. di agrumic. e
Fruttic. 37: 1-4. Smith, H. S. & H. Compere.
1916. Observations on the Lestophonus, a dipterous
parasite of the cottony cushion scale.
Bull. Calif. Dept. Agric. 5:
384-90. Stepanov, E. M.
1935. The biological method of
controlling pests of plants in Abkhazia.
[Abs. in REv. Appl. Ent. (A), 24:
674). Subramanium, T. V.
1955. Control of the fluted
scale in peninsular India. Indian J.
Ent. 16: 391-415. Subramanium, T. V.
1955. Control of the fluted
scale in peninsular India. Indian J.
Ent. 17: 103-20. Thorpe, W. H. 1930. The biology, post-embryonic development,
and economic importance of Cryptochaetum
iceryae (Diptera,
Agromyzidae) parasitic on Icerya
purchasi (Coccidae,
Monophlebini). Zool. Soc. London
Proc. 60: 929-71. Wille, J. E. 1935. Icerya
purchasi y Novius cardinalis. (Peru)
Min. de Fomento, Dir. Agric. y Ganad. Informe 32. 23 p. Wille, J. E. 1941. Resçmen de los diferences labores
ejecutadas en el Peru para combatir insectos daninos por el "método
biológico." 6th Pacific Sci.
Cong. Proc (1939) 4: 369-71. Wolcott, G. N. & F. Sein, Jr. 1933. A year's
experience with the cottony cushion scale in Puerto Rico. Puerto Rico Dept. Agric. J. 17: 199-21. |