FILE: <ch-30.htm> GENERAL INDEX [Navigate
to MAIN MENU
]
[For
educational purposes only; do not review, quote or abstract]
|
COCONUT SCALE, Aspidiotus destructor Signoret -- Diaspididae (Contacts) The coconut scale posed a serious problem to the copra industry
in Fiji just about the time that the coconut moth, Levuana irridescens
B.-B.-, was coming under successful biological control. Coconut scale was first recorded as a pest
of bananas in 1912 and in 1916 of coconuts.
Damage was severe enough to cause H. W. Simmonds, the Government
Entomologist in Fiji, to seek natural enemies in Tahiti in 1920 where the
scale was known to be present in lower numbers. Two parasitic species imported and established were Aphytis chrysomphali Mercet and Aspidiotiphagus
citrinus Craw, and by
1925 these were distributed to many islands in the Fiji group. The parasitoids spread rapidly and were
considered to be doing some good, but the scale continued to spread to new
islands, causing severe outbreaks (DeBach 1974). Coconut scale prefers the underside of leaves where it sucks
plant juices. Severe infestations
forms a continuous overlapping crust of thousands of scales per leaf,
resulting in the leaf turning yellow, withering and sometimes dying. By 1927 in spite of rigid quarantines,
coconut scale had spread to nearly all of the Fiji islands and was the most
serious pest of coconut in Fiji since coconut moth. In 1926 an attempt was made to secure additional natural
enemies from Java. Dr. T. H. C.
Taylor was given the assignment, which was plagued with transportation
difficulties because of the lengthy sea voyage and the paucity of ships
sailing from Java to Fiji. However,
Taylor was able to make arrangements to ship his parasitoids and predators on
a vessel carrying a cargo of other organisms to Fiji: laborers from India. The steamer Ganges out of India, stopped in Java on January 1, 1927
and sailed on to Fiji on January 2 with Taylor and his infested coconut palms
in Wardian cages. Three weeks later
they arrived in Fiji, but a severe outbreak of smallpox on board prevented
the shipment from being landed at Suva, but rather on the quarantine island
of Nukulau, where the insects had to be tended for another five weeks with
poor rearing facilities and limited stocks of scales. Therefore, although some parasitoids and
predators were colonized on Nukulau and later around Suva and some recoveries
made, no permanent establishment occurred (DeBach 1974). After mid 1927, it was evident that the natural enemies from Java
either were ineffective or were not established. Therefore, J. D. Tothill, then Director of Agriculture for
Fiji, assigned Taylor to go to Trinidad to investigate several species of
laydbird beetles which Urich had recorded as being important factors in the
control of coconut scale there (DeBach 1974). Taylor began his work in Trinidad in September 1927 with a
survey of the natural enemies present.
He found five species of ladybird beetles to be somewhat common and
effective, even though at times they were heavily attacked by
parasitoids. These latter he subsequently
took care to exclude from the shipments that he made to Fiji. By January 28, 1928, his collections of
ladybird beetles and stocks of scale-infested palms were ready and were
loaded on board ship. Nine large
cages were used, holding 6-8 or more infested young palms. Three newly designed extra large cages
required four men to lift and more them.
Additional food for the predators in the form of 80 heavily
scale-infested young palms were carried along in 5-gal. tins. All had to be carefully arranged to
protect them from rough handling and damage from salt water during the
voyage. Although the initial predator stocks were limited to 200 adult
beetles, plus some larvae and pupae per cage, the predators increased so
rapidly during the voyage that many had to be removed to keep them from
completely eliminating the food supply and thus starving to death before
arrival in Fiji. Trans shipment of
the stock was made at Panama on February 1, 1928 to a steamer going via
Tahiti to Suva, Fiji, the entire trip taking a little more than five weeks. All five species of ladybird beetles
arrived in Fiji in sufficient numbers to enable culture, but more than twice
as many Cryptognatha nodiceps Mshl (1,517) as
compared to all of the other four species (746) cultured, which may have been
an indication of the ultimate dominant role played by C. noticeps. Insectary culture in Fiji was difficult, so a method was devised
of breeding in the field within cloth sleeve covered, heavily infested banana
leaves. In each sleeve, starting with
20 beetles, about 300 would be recovered in one month's time, a return of
15:1 with minimum expense and labor.
By September 1928 only C.
nodiceps was cultured small
numbers remaining of the other four species were liberated. Some of the latter became temporarily
established but eventually disappeared.
The coconut scale problem was reduced to non economic levels on
all important islands in Fiji within nine months. After 18 months the scale was so rare if was difficult to
find. During the peak of the
reductions, adult beetles and larvae swarmed on every tree and the adults
could be readily seen flying around in the air. The trees changed from yellow to bright green. When Taylor published his report of this
success in 1935, not a single new outbreak had occurred. The same results occurred on all host plants,
many of which had been as badly infested as coconuts (Taylor 1935). DeBach (1974) reported that he visited
Fiji in 1969 and found hardly any coconut scale, even though an occasional Cryptognatha
adult was seen rapidly searching the clean leaves. He stated it is evidently an excellent
searcher that can survive at very low host densities like the vedalia
beetle. Additionally it probably
feeds on alternative host scales on other host plants. DeBach (1974) found the Aphytis mentioned earlier as
being rather common on coconut scale in Fiji. Out of only one light infestation of the scale on avocado,
parasitization by Aphytis
was considerable, and he thought that some credit also might be given to the
parasitoid (DeBach 1974). In Mauritius Chilocorus
politus and C. nigritus eliminated the threat
of coconut scale to plantations.
Spectacular control of coconut scale was achieved in New Hebrides as a
result of Rhizobius pulchellus Montrozier
(Cochereau 1965). See Rosen &
DeBach (1978) for biological control activities against coconut scale in
other countries. A subspecies of coconut scale, Aspidiotus destructor rigidus Reyne, was discovered in Indonesia. Its life cycle is about 1 1/2 times that
of the typical coconut scale, and the female lays only 10-12 eggs. It has somewhat different host preferences
than the typical form, but may cause severe damage to coconut (Reyne
1947). Comperiella unifasciata was introduced but
never attained high parasitization (Reyne 1948). In South Bali, Aspidiotiphagus
citrinus reportedly
controlled coconut scale completely by 1936 (Voute 1937) (also see Reyne
1948, Simmonds 1960, Wilson 1960 and Wolcott 1960). REFERENCES: [Additional references may be found at: MELVYL
Library ] Balachowsky,
A. 1948. Les cochenilles de france, d'europe, du nord de l'afrique et du
bassin mediterraneen. IV. Monographie des Coccoidea. Classification--Diaspidinae (Premiere
Partie). Hermann et Cie., Paris. 154 p. Cochereau,
P. 1965. Contre un ravageur du cocotier aux nouvelles-Hebrides. Controle biologique d'Aspidiotus destructor
Signoret (Homoptera-Diaspinae) par Lindorus
lophantae Blaisd.
(Coleoptera-Coccinellidae) Ile Vate.
Oleagineaux 20: 507-12. DeBach,
P. 1974. Biological Control by Natural Enemies. Cambridge University Press, London &
New York. 323 p. Ferris,
G. F. 1938. Atlas of the scale insects of North America, series II. Family Diaspididae. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, California. Moutia,
L. A. 1942. Division of Entomology.
Mauritius Dept. Agr. Rept. 1941:
14-21. Moutia,
L. A. & R. Mamet. 1946. Review of twenty-five years of economic
entomology in the Island of Mauritius.
Bull. Ent. Res. 36: 439-72. Reyne,
A. 1947. Notes on the biology of Comperiella
unifasciata Ishii and its
host Aspidiotus destructor rigidus nov. subspec.
Tijdschr. Ent. 88 (1945):
294-302. Reyne,
A. 1948. Studies on a serious outbreak of Aspidiotus destructor
rigidus in the coconut palms
of Sangi (North Celebes). Tijdschr.
Ent. 89 (1946): 83-123. Rosen, D.
& P. DeBach. 1978. Diaspididae. In: C. P. Clausen (ed.), Introduced Parasites
and Predators of Arthropod Pests and Weeds.
U. S. Dept. Agric., Agric. Handbk. No. 480. 545 p. Simmonds,
F. J. 1960. Biological control of the coconut scale, Aspidiotus destructor
Sign., in Principe, Portuguese West Africa.
Bull. Ent. Res. 51: 223-37. Taylor,
T. H. C. 1935. The campaign against Aspidiotus destructor
Sign. in Fiji. Bull. Ent. Res. 26: 1-102. Voute, A.
D. 1937. The biological control of insects in the Netherlands East
Indies. Natuurk. Tijdschr. V. Nederland.-Indie 97: 28-34. Wilson,
F. 1960. A review of the biological control of insects and weeds in
Australia and Australian New Guinea.
Commonwealth Inst. Biol. Control. Tech. Commun. 1: 102 p. Wolcott,
G. N. 1960. Efficiency of ladybeetles (Coccinellidae: Coleoptera) in insect
control. Puerto Rico Univ. J. Agric.
44: 166-72. |