Social network analysis

Homophily and social segregation


This page is part of the materials supporting Sociology 157, an undergraduate introductory course on social network analysis. The course is taught by Robert A. Hanneman of the Department of Sociology at the University of California, Riverside. Feel free to use and reproduce these materials(with citation). For more information, or to offer comments, you can send me e-mail.
Sources:
Hanneman and Riddle, Chapter 18 (optional)
Homophily and social segregation:

Review Questions

  1. Clustering in graphs of social networks is commonly found.  Explain how homophily could account for such an outcome.
  2. Briefly explain Homans' theory, and provide an example.
  3. Schelling showed that residential segregation is the expected outcome, even when members of each group were quite tolerant of living in "mixed" neighborhoods.  Explain why this occurs.
  4. According to Blau's theory of group size and interaction, are the members of a small minority, or are the members of a large majority more likely to interact with members of the other group?
  5. Sketch a blocked diagram for a matrix with three groups.  Show expected block densities that would be consistent with the "constant homophily" model, the "variable homophily" model, and a model that showed no tendency toward homphily.
  6. How do the pattern of ties within the group differ between the "core" and the "periphery" groups in a core-periphery block model of group interaction?

Application Questions

Find data on the patterns of residential segregation by ethnicity for the community you live in (try web searches, or see your government publications reference librarian).  What theories might explain the pattern?

If interaction with others who you believe to be "different" from you strengthens your sense of how different you are, would we expect European Americans or African Americans to have a stronger sense of ethnic identity?  Why?

The theory of homophily suggests that there is a stronger tendency to form social ties with others who are regarded as similar, than there is a tendency to form ties with others who are regarded as different.  Consider the relationships among business organizations.  Does the theory seem to apply?  If not, why not?

Some theorists describe the economic relationships among nations in the global economy as "unequal exchange" and "dependency" between "core" nations (rich, post-industrial), "semi-peripheral" nations (moderately wealthy, industrial), and "peripheral" nations (poor, raw material producing).  Are these "World Systems" theorists using the terms "core" and "periphery" in the same way that network analysts do?


top of this page
index of lecture outlines
course home page