The Moral Behavior of Ethics Professors: Relationships Among Self-Reported Behavior, Expressed Normative Attitude, and Directly Observed Behavior
Eric Schwitzgebel and Joshua Rust
Philosophical Psychology (2014), 27, 293-327
We examine the self-reported moral attitudes and moral behavior of 198 ethics professors, 208 non-ethicist philosophers, and 167 professors in departments other than philosophy on eight moral issues: academic society membership, voting, staying in touch with one's mother, vegetarianism, organ and blood donation, responsiveness to student emails, charitable giving, and honesty in responding to survey questionnaires. On some issues we also had direct behavioral measures that we could compare with self-report. Ethicists expressed somewhat more stringent normative attitudes on some issues, such as vegetarianism and charitable donation. However, on no issue did ethicists show significantly better behavior than the two comparison groups. Our findings on attitude-behavior consistency were mixed: Ethicists showed the strongest relationship between behavior and expressed moral attitude regarding voting but the weakest regarding charitable donation.
IRB approval: U.C. Riverside HRRB HS-09-002Published version at Philosophical Psychology
By following either of the links below, you are requesting a copy for personal use only, in accord with "fair use" laws.
Click here to view this document as a PDF file: The Self-Reported Moral Behavior of Ethics Professors (March 16, 2011).
Or here to view as an HTM file: The Self-Reported Moral Behavior of Ethics Professors (March 16, 2011).
Or email eschwitz at domain: ucr.edu for a copy of this paper.
Return to Eric Schwitzgebel's homepage.