Do Things Look Flat?  (Commentary on Noe's Action in Perception [2004])

in draft

Abstract: Does a penny viewed at an angle in some sense look elliptical, as though projected on a two-dimensional surface?  Many philosophers have said such things, from Malebranche (1674/1997) and Hume (1739/1978), through early sense-data theorists, to Tye (2000) and Noë (2004).  I confess that it doesn’t seem this way to me, though I’m somewhat baffled by the phenomenology and pessimistic about our ability to resolve the dispute.  I conjecture that, maybe, projectivist views draw some of their appeal by over-analogizing visual experience to painting or photography.  Theorists writing in contexts where vision is analogized to less projective media – signet ring impressions in wax in ancient Greece, stereoscopy in introspective psychology circa 1900 – seem substantially less likely to attribute such projective distortions to visual appearances.

Click below to view this document as a PDF file.

Do Things Look Flat? (PDF, January 12, 2006)

Or here for an html version:

Do Things Look Flat? (HTML, January 12, 2006)

Or email eschwitz at domain: ucr.edu for a copy of this paper.

Return to Eric Schwitzgebel's homepage.